Thomas,
We use a program called Guinevere, that works with Novell GroupWise
systems to filer the e-mail after it has passed through SA. All of the
suggestions I have received seem to point to the fact that this may be
where the error lies. I appreciate all the suggestions by the group.
>>> Thomas Arend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 01/14 11:00 AM >>>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 14. Januar 2005 13:04 schrieb Loren Wilton:
> Well, it obviously was scored correctly, and showed at least some
headers
> indicating this. So SA must be doing its job.
>
> Since SA isn't in charge of deciding what to DO with the mail once it
is
> scored, the problem must lie in some other part of your system.
>
> The only possibiliity I can think of offhand (and I don't have your
> original posting left to check) might be that the original mail
didn't have
> a Subject, in which case 3.0.1 and 3.0 would not have done subject
markup.
> So if you were filtering on subject, then it would probably have made
it
> through.
His original message had a subject:
Subject: ***Spam*** i just cheated on my boyfriend
and a
X-Spam-Prev-Subject: i just cheated on my boyfriend
nether noticed this on my spam but I include the message in an appendix
not in
the text.
All messages are passed back. So to redirect mails to other
destinations then
the original recipient is a task of the Mail-transport an not a task of
spammassassin.
So what we need to know is the rule to filter mails after
spam-checking.
Thomas
> Loren
- --
icq:133073900
http://www.t-arend.de
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB5+y+He2ZLU3NgHsRAunCAJ0XUFhqlQF2RRtbSufjeht5WafFVwCeJpIS
Oig+HehjhaADgpJjcW3eELA=
=xwli
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
