> At 08:52 PM 1/10/2005, kalin mintchev wrote: >>apparently this massage never got to the list so here i'm sending it >> again. > > Your original message did reach the list.
thanks Matt... i didn't get it. i looked at my spam folder too... > >>after all the way i describe below. i just checked my email and out of 24 >>new messages 22 were spam. something's wrong.... >>what could it be? > > Well, let's see here, you just sa-learn --spam'ed 2500 emails. How many did > you sa-learn --ham at the same time? about the same amount. mostly my own mail and mail from a different mailing lists although mail from the mysql list is categorized as spam right now.. > > Have you looked at the X-Spam-Status of any of the messages? Look what > rules are matching, this will be your best hint to the problem. yes. but there isn't anything indicating that the spam db are used or tests are being done against them. should there be any? i read in the documentation that use_bayes is set to 1 (true) by default so i don't have to add anything in the user-conf except the db location: bayes_path /path/to/spamdb does ending forward slash matter? thanks again.... > > If you're lost, post a 3 or so X-Spam-Status headers, maybe one of us can > pick out the trend. > > --
