Per Jessen wrote: > So the question is - what is the need for maintaining 2.64?
Little to none, IMO. I'm baffled by what people are doing to their poor servers to make them break the way I constantly see reported on this list and elsewhere. <g> > Show of hands, > who's still on 2.64 with no exact plans to upgrade? Here; 3 systems. I have no reason to upgrade at the moment because everything's working Just Fine Thanks. Also, 3.0x has been reported to be more of a resource hog than 2.x, and one system is near its limits (although MTA-level RBLs rave dropped the spam rate to ~4:1 from ~10:1 spam:ham, and the message volume has gone down by a factor of ~5). -kgd -- Get your mouse off of there! You don't know where that email has been!
