From: "ChupaCabra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> First he wanted that.  I did it but actually kept em all.  So then his 
> partner didn't get an urgent email so it was turned back to the users to 
> decide.  I get a different kneejerk each week.  What fun dealing with an 
> 80 yo ex military man.  This am it was "Lets spambomb every isp that 
> sends spam  and maybe *they*  will do something about it.  And screw the 
> rest of the world too.  America owns the internet.  Fsck Em, they would 
> all die without the american economy, etc....."

Since there is some sense in that organization it would be wiser to
take the 10 points or higher spams and save them off for a few weeks.
It might also be wise to scan down some of the SARE rule sets that
cover things you'll never receive legitimately in your office and
multiply their scores by 2 or 3 across the board for a special
rule set. (Actually, copy the rule set, file off the scores, revise
the scores to your custom far higher values, and toss them into a
z_local.cf file that will get processed last.) That way scanning spam
may become a less disgusting job.

(I LIKE that idea. Methinks I'll do that for my user_prefs file. Now,
if the SARE people could develop a "score multiplier" concept for their
rule sets so their relative weighting could be tweaked....)

{^_^}

Reply via email to