On Wednesday, December 8, 2004, 8:22:24 AM, Matthew Romanek wrote: > FYI (and for future list-searchers), the problem with URIDNSBL > appearing to work but not actually scoring was because the host's > resolv.conf included 127.0.0.1, which apparently something doesn't > like.
One possibility is that some code has 127.0.0.1 as a "bad" address. In particular this is one reason why RBLs usually don't list 127.0.0.1 as a result code, which could clearly break things where the loopback address appears in message headers, for example. Just a WAG for someone to check in future. Glad to hear you got things working! Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
