On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 10:27:29AM -0600, Jon Dossey wrote: > Wow! 0.1 seconds, now that's fast! > > Then I saw this: "tests=none" > > I guess it would be fast if it doesn't have to really *do* anything!
tests=none just mean that it didn't hit any rules, not that it didn't run any
rules. You can try sending a GTUBE through.
> So have we really narrowed it down at all? We know that spamd is taking
> a long time during some test it performs, but we don't really know if
> its related to RBL checks.
Well, we've proven it's network related, but haven't narrowed it down to which
network check.
-D may help, I would probably try slowly reenabling things. ie: remove -L but
disable razor, dcc, pyzor, URIBL, etc.
Also, check to see if you have any timeouts set to 15s. The default RBL
timeout is 15s, so it could be that, but most of the queries would have to
fail to actually get to 15s (as queries return, the timeout gets lower).
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
: No comment, since this is still hovering (see Larry's reply).
Flutter, flutter.
-- Larry Wall in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpUIIrlGuam1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
