> On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 10:11:26AM -0600, Jon Dossey wrote: > > Machine is a nameserver (bind 9.3.0), load average 0.00 0.00 0.00 (test > > machine, not in production). I tried changing skip_rbl_checks to 1, and > > testing again. Took 15.1 seconds to process. > > Run spamd with -L. skip_rbl_checks only skips the RBL checks. Could be > Razor, DCC, URIBL (I think it ignores skip_rbl_checks), etc.
We've got a winner! Dec 6 10:23:29 dhgsrv17 spamd[31064]: got connection over /var/run/spamd.socket Dec 6 10:23:29 dhgsrv17 spamd[31064]: processing message (unknown) for root:500. Dec 6 10:23:29 dhgsrv17 spamd[31064]: clean message (0.0/5.0) for root:500 in 0.1 seconds, 344 bytes. Dec 6 10:23:29 dhgsrv17 spamd[31064]: result: . 0 - scantime=0.1,size=344,mid=(unknown),autolearn=failed Wow! 0.1 seconds, now that's fast! Then I saw this: "tests=none" I guess it would be fast if it doesn't have to really *do* anything! So have we really narrowed it down at all? We know that spamd is taking a long time during some test it performs, but we don't really know if its related to RBL checks. Thanks for your help so far Theo. .jon __________________________________________________________________________ "The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers."
