> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: vrijdag 3 december 2004 7:51
> To: SpamAssassin Users
> Subject: Re: What is up with surbl.org?
>
> >> Perhaps he should. Seriously, I heavily rely on the rating.
> >> cloudmark.com data; surbl.org should *never* have been in there.
> >> The folks at cloudmark really need to manually inspect their entries;
> >> next thing this list has a bad rep too.
>
> > Hi Mark,
> > I've not familiar with Cloudmark. Would you mind contacting them
> > for us, with some of the possible explanations why they probably
> > have an error, as already mentioned here?
>
> FWIW I tried to send a note to Vipul. No idea if he will get it.
rating.cloudmark.com is a new reputation service. In general, I am
quite happy with them. I will contact them, too.
> Mark, it could still help if you contact Cloudmark for us, since
> you're a customer of theirs and familiar with the issues. FWIW
> I can't email you:
>
> > ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > (reason: 550 5.7.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Cloudmark
> Status of MAIL FROM Domain [surbl.org]: Bad)
> >
> > ----- Transcript of session follows -----
> > ... while talking to mail.asarian-host.net.:
> >>>> MAIL From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SIZE=1648
> > <<< 550 5.7.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Cloudmark Status of MAIL
> FROM Domain [surbl.org]: Bad 554 5.0.0 Service unavailable
That just goes to show never to rely too heavily on a reputation service,
no matter how reputable they may be. :)
- Mark
System Administrator Asarian-host.org
---
"If you were supposed to understand it,
we wouldn't call it code." - FedEx
