At 03:50 PM 12/2/2004, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
*** BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 08:42:34PM +0000, Mark wrote:
> How come surbl.org has a "Bad" status at rating.cloudmark.com? (see
> below). This is not good.

That's really a question for the Cloudmark people.  My guess is that
domains that have mailing lists which talk about spam get a bad rating
since people still incorrectly scan those lists through anti-spam
software.

Another guess would be that rating is using data from razor reports. If someone reports a SA tagged message to razor without stripping the tags, the surbl.org domain is going to appear in the message body as a byproduct of the rule descriptions.




Reply via email to