Hi, thanks so much for your help regarding subject tagging.

For postfix+amavis-new/clamd+spamassasssin setup, can it be
set up to have a perdomain user_pref?

 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UsingSQL

it is correct that, although spamassassin read it's local.cf file, the whole
setting stuff are controlled by amavisd.conf, isn't it? if this is so, how can
i achieve a per-domain settings?

I surely hope you get what i'm tryin to say here.. thanks

thanks.


*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********
Re: subject tagging doesn't work.. :(

On 11/15/2004 at 6:47 PM D.J. Fan wrote:

>>
>>yes, ok.. will try that..
>>mydefault experimental setting are these:
>>
>>$sa_tag_level_deflt  = -999; # add spam info headers if at, or above that
>>level
>>$sa_tag2_level_deflt = 1.0; # add 'spam detected' headers at that level
>>#$sa_tag2_level_deflt = 5.0; # add 'spam detected' headers at that level
>>$sa_kill_level_deflt = $sa_tag2_level_deflt; # triggers spam evasive actio
>>
>>
>> >
>> >What is $sa_kill_level_deflt set to?
>> >The subject will only change for mail that scores between
>> >$sa_tag2_level_deflt and $sa_kill_level_deflt and is
>> >delivered to a recipient (not quarantined). Temporarily
>> >set $sa_kill_level_deflt to 999.0 and see if the
>> >subject changes (all spam will be passed, not quarantined).
>> >
>> >From amavisd.conf-sample:
>> >
>> ># (only seen when spam is passed and recipient is
>> ># in local_domains*)
>> >
>
>Yeah, you will not get any subject change with $sa_kill_level_deflt =
>$sa_tag2_level_deflt;
>If you have a quarantine area defined (like you do) then mail that
>scores 5.0 or higher will get quarantined (like it does for you).
>There is no point to rewrite the subject for mail that ends up in
>quarantine.
>It only makes sense to do so for mail that is passed to a recipient.
>I personally set $sa_kill_level_deflt = 8.0;
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Check out Election 2004 for up-to-date election news, plus voter tools and
>more! http://special.msn.com/msn/election2004.armx



Reply via email to