I just tried to remove all rules but one and it's still not hitting
it... Would there be anything that would cause spamassassin to bypass
the local.cf?

-----Original Message-----
From: Johnson, S 
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 10:49 AM
To: Matt Kettler; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: {SPAM} custom rule issues

LMAO.  I needed a good laugh.  I liked your comment.  I agree 100%.

Anyway, I did run the --lint -D against the rules and nothing came up
other than the normal unable to find pyzor, etc... (since I don't use
them)

I did go through the file again looking for slashes or anything out of
place and couldn't see any problems.

Is there anything else to look at?

-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 10:18 AM
To: Johnson, S; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: {SPAM} custom rule issues

At 10:58 AM 11/11/2004, Johnson, S wrote:
>  I added in some custom rules into my local.cf file.  They were
working 
> fine for a while.  I then added a couple of more rules in and still
got 
> the spam I was trying to stop from a while back.  When I went back
into 
> the maillog I noticed that none of the rules I wrote are not being 
> hit.  This also includes some of the older rules that were working.

Those rules, at casual glance, look fine. But any typo in the whole file

could cause a problem.

Have you run spamassassin --lint lately? That's pretty much your 
first-check if you've got a problem like this. Sometimes SA's parser
gets 
so confused by a typo it will skip the rest of the config. (a missing /
at 
the end of a regex will cause this quite quickly)

>

>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>Confidentiality Notice

Damn spammers. (Those who dictate the insertion of these things are no 
better than spammers IMO. Not that this is your fault, but most likely
some 
political dimwit on the board of ed in MN.)

The thing is so vague as to be worthless. Am I the intended recipient? 
Well.. it's in my mailbox, so I must be... And if not, well, it's in 
multiple public web archives now, and no disclaimer will stop that.




=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Confidentiality Notice

If the information in this electronic communication relates to an
individual pupil, it is a confidential pupil record under Minnesota Law
and may not be reviewed, distributed, or copied by any person other than
the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. This electronic communication
is intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is
addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any further review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this electronic communication
or any attachment thereto is strictly prohibited. If you have received
an electronic communication in error, you should immediately return it
to the sender and delete it from your system.




=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Confidentiality Notice

If the information in this electronic communication relates to an individual 
pupil, it is a confidential pupil record under Minnesota Law and may not be 
reviewed, distributed, or copied by any person other than the individual(s) to 
whom it is addressed. This electronic communication is intended solely for the 
use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended 
recipient, any further review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this 
electronic communication or any attachment thereto is strictly prohibited. If 
you have received an electronic communication in error, you should immediately 
return it to the sender and delete it from your system.

Reply via email to