> Out of addled curiosity (not pointing specifically at you David) why has > nobody mentioned the traditional "SpamAssassin is slow" mantra, "Try > more memory?"
I think because memory does not seem to be an issue for me. I have 1GB RAM and each spamd process sits at around 34MB. I don't have any swapping at all. I could throw another gig in, but that doesn't really seem to be the problem from what I can tell. Am I overlooking something? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
