At 04:42 PM 10/29/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the responses. Good explanations that make perfect sense.
SO.. now that I'm past the hex-in-db issue, I clearly do have some issue nonetheless. The following spam got through with a score of -4.3, seemingly because of the AWL. My AWL, however is empty per tools/check_whitelist. How could this have happened:

1) I don't see the AWL being generated by YOUR version of SA.. I see it being generated by someone who is using a DIFFERENT version of SA...


X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 8.2-spambr_6119620U on tradeexperts.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=4.8-spambr_398464947C

That's not you.. you're not running a "spambr" variant of SA.

I'd double-check and make sure you're not doing something like bypassing all mail that has an X-Spam-Status header.. that's a sure-fire way to be abused by spammers as above.

2) YOUR system is generating these hits (from your debug output)

debug: tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_60,MISSING_HEADERS,MISSING_SUBJECT,NO_REAL_NAME

YOUR problem seems to be the hit of ALL_TRUSTED.

debug: metadata: X-Spam-Relays-Trusted:
debug: metadata: X-Spam-Relays-Untrusted:

That looks like SA being unable to parse any of the Received: headers in the message.. Not so good.






Reply via email to