Definitely not, I'm using SA 3.0.1 on a dual 1.13ghz P3 with 2gb RAM with SCSI, processing a fair bit of mail.
I have 25 spamd children running, and the load is typically like this ; > w 9:46AM up 9 days, 13:06, 1 user, load averages: 1.14, 1.46, 1.59 Cheers Gav On 28/10/04 9:13 AM, "email builder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> BTW, SpamAssassin *is* CPU-intensive. It's designed that way ;) > > But not as CPU intensive as I am seeing. According to others on this list, I > should not be seeing a mere five spamd children completely dominating a > 2.8GHz(HT) processor. >
