On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 08:27:02AM -0700, Potato Chip wrote: > -3.3 ALL_TRUSTED Most of these unmarked spams hit ALL_TRUSTED with a > default score of -3.3. It almost completely discounts the SURBL score > hits.
If you're getting ALL_TRUSTED hits on messages that came from the outside
through a non-trusted server, then something it up there. The reports I've
seen about it so far are related to something like an anti-virus gateway not
adding in proper Received headers, passing the mail to SpamAssassin.
> Have most people changed the default SURBL scores to something more
> meaningful, higher? It seems worthy of a higher score given the great
> reviews that SURBL has been getting?
SURBL is great, but it does get FPs. If you don't mind that (and the
possibility of having SA FP the mail into the "spam" category), go ahead
and up the score. :)
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
Q. Why is this so clumsy?
A. The trick is to use Perl's strengths rather than its weaknesses.
-- Larry Wall in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpPpMsbw8rbr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
