"Loren Wilton" writes: > > AB> This rule seems to work well, but I've noticed that sometimes SA will > > AB> detect the rule but not count the score. ... > > > > Can't answer that. In addition to the -D test you offered, it might > > provide useful information if the SARE version has the same problem on > > your system. > > Interestingly, I'm still running 2.63, and while going thru the month's > spams earlier this evening looking for patterns, I was noticing a rule that > should have fired in many cases was failing to fire randomly in a number of > cases. Running the rule manually would trip every time, but it clearly > didn't fire on a number of mails when they were originally processed. > > Perhaps this is a problem that is older than 3.0, and has just been noticed.
That's a good point. I think I noticed that happening with 2.64, too, except the rule name wasn't listed in the report, like it is with 3.0. Arun
