Matt Kettler writes: > At 04:31 PM 9/30/2004, Arun Bhalla wrote: > > > >Hi, about a week ago I upgraded to SA 3.0.0 from 2.64. I run spamd (wit > h > > > >options "-d -c"), and call spamc from my .procmailrc. SA is installed > > > >systemwide (e.g., local.cf is in /etc/mail/spamassassin), but I > > > >also have my own user_prefs file that I tweak. > > > > > > > > > Is allow_user_rules set in local.cf? If not, spamd is required to ignore > > > your rules in user_prefs, and it's a bug that they are being parsed at al > l. > > > >Good question! I should have mentioned that, but yes, it is. > > > >allow_user_rules 1 > > > >So it's not that. > > Ok, next shot.. any complaints issued when you run spamassassin --lint?
Not now, but there were some warnings a little earlier today that I fixed. Looks like it was just 2.6->3.0 warnings, and I commented all of the lines out. I wouldn't expect that they would cause any trouble. % spamassassin --lint config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: rewrite_subject 0 config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: use_terse_report 1 warning: score set for non-existent rule X_OSIRU_DUL_FH warning: score set for non-existent rule X_OSIRU_DUL warning: score set for non-existent rule X_OSIRU_SPAMWARE_SITE warning: score set for non-existent rule X_OSIRU_SPAM_SRC warning: score set for non-existent rule RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM warning: score set for non-existent rule X_OSIRU_OPEN_RELAY lint: 8 issues detected. please rerun with debug enabled for more information. Arun
