Hi Alessandro, I somehow assumed he was asking about the terms component/handler because I also needed to use filters with it in the past and failed
https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/query-guide/terms-component.html — > On Jul 23, 2024, at 19:19, Alessandro Benedetti <a.benede...@sease.io> wrote: > > "Out of the box it is not supported, and facet can be used in this use > case." > > What do you mean? > > Filtering and faceting are two separate features. > Filter queries are supported to run in conjunction with any query ( > https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/query-guide/common-query-parameters.html#fq-filter-query-parameter), > they have their own cache and so on as so forth. > > Faceting on the other hand can be used to run aggregations and count terms, > ranges and much more in the query result list. > > You can have different query parsers in filter queries and your query, so > term queries are not a problem per se. > > Cheers > -------------------------- > *Alessandro Benedetti* > Director @ Sease Ltd. > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer* > *Apache Solr PMC Member* > > e-mail: a.benede...@sease.io > > > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied > Consulting | Training | Open Source > > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/> > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github > <https://github.com/seaseltd> > > > On Thu, 18 Jul 2024 at 21:33, ufuk yılmaz <uyil...@vivaldi.net.invalid> > wrote: > >> Do you want to filter the terms themselves or do you want to filter the >> documents and get the terms of the filtered subset? >> >> —ufuk >> >> — >> >>> On Jul 18, 2024, at 1:46, Natarajan, Rajeswari < >> rajeswari.natara...@sap.com.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Looking to see if we can get terms query working with filters (extensive >> filters use case including range filters). Out of the box it is not >> supported, and facet can be used in this use case. Facet response times are >> bad for a large index. >>> So trying to see if filters can be combined with terms query. Anyone >> already tried this? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Rajeswari >> >>
