"Out of the box it is not supported, and facet can be used in this use case."
What do you mean? Filtering and faceting are two separate features. Filter queries are supported to run in conjunction with any query ( https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/query-guide/common-query-parameters.html#fq-filter-query-parameter), they have their own cache and so on as so forth. Faceting on the other hand can be used to run aggregations and count terms, ranges and much more in the query result list. You can have different query parsers in filter queries and your query, so term queries are not a problem per se. Cheers -------------------------- *Alessandro Benedetti* Director @ Sease Ltd. *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer* *Apache Solr PMC Member* e-mail: a.benede...@sease.io *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied Consulting | Training | Open Source Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/> LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github <https://github.com/seaseltd> On Thu, 18 Jul 2024 at 21:33, ufuk yılmaz <uyil...@vivaldi.net.invalid> wrote: > Do you want to filter the terms themselves or do you want to filter the > documents and get the terms of the filtered subset? > > —ufuk > > — > > > On Jul 18, 2024, at 1:46, Natarajan, Rajeswari < > rajeswari.natara...@sap.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Looking to see if we can get terms query working with filters (extensive > filters use case including range filters). Out of the box it is not > supported, and facet can be used in this use case. Facet response times are > bad for a large index. > > So trying to see if filters can be combined with terms query. Anyone > already tried this? > > > > Thanks, > > Rajeswari > >
