Thanks Alan,
Do not hesitate if you have any comment or feedback. Regards, Adel ________________________________ From: Alan Conway <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 4:41:06 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Dispatch Router] Unexpected behavior when starting the same dispatch router twice On Tue, 2017-02-14 at 20:35 +0000, Adel Boutros wrote: > Hello, > > > Was anyone able to take a look at the submitted patches? I am just about to. Have been working on the proton side and on other stuff lately but am going back to dispatch now. I will try to ensure that your fixes either get committed or that I don't step on them if they are in areas that I am changing. Will give you a preview on github ASAP. Cheers, Alan. > > > Regards, > > Adel > > ________________________________ > From: Adel Boutros <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2017 4:24:30 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Dispatch Router] Unexpected behavior when starting the > same dispatch router twice > > Hello Alan, > > > Just to not lose the history, I will reply to your before last mail > here. > > > My changes does impact the 3 files you mentioned however they are > very trivial... > > > Regarding libuv, I tried to compile it on Linux (Red Hat 6.4) but one > of the tests failed and Google suggested many encountered that > problem (which I forgot because I did it some time ago :( ). So I > didn't even try it on Solaris. > > > As Solaris is one of our main platforms, I am more than happy to test > whatever developments you have on Solaris but the only problem I > might have is the bandwidth I will have to fix any errors which will > be detected. > > > Regards, > > Adel > > > ________________________________ > From: Alan Conway <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2017 4:23:23 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Dispatch Router] Unexpected behavior when starting the > same dispatch router twice > > On Thu, 2017-02-02 at 15:16 +0000, Adel Boutros wrote: > > d have a look at them. > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-627 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-626 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-624 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-623 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-622 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-621 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-620 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-619 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-618 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-617 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-616 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-615 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-614 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-613 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-612 > > > I've added a comment to the JIRA and I will review them all before I > commit the proactor work. I may ask you to test a preview of the work > on solaris before I commit depending on how complicated it looks. > > Cheers, > Alan. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
