Hello Alan,
Great to hear that! I don't know what are the classes in the Dispatch Router which will be refactored and maybe some of my patches will be irrelevant. It took me 2 weeks to be able to compile and test the Dispatch Router 0.7.0 (A large part of the code evolved since 0.5.0). All the patches are listed below. I hope you could have a look at them. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-627 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-626 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-624 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-623 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-622 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-621 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-620 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-619 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-618 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-617 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-616 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-615 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-614 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-613 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-612 Regards, Adel ________________________________ From: Alan Conway <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2017 4:03:50 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Dispatch Router] Unexpected behavior when starting the same dispatch router twice On Fri, 2017-01-20 at 15:10 +0000, Adel Boutros wrote: > We have not yet compiled proton with libuv so I might not be that > straightforward for us. > > > I hope the new I/O will work easily because I have already around 7 > patches for 0.7.0 and I am at 27% compilation. > > So do I :) If you want a preview I can put snapshots on a branch. It is sort-of working but still full of holes where I cut out the old driver, and it falls down one of them from time to time. I am filling them in as fast as I can... I'll take account of any patches on master as I go, if you have patches that aren't ported to master for some reason, and you think they might be relevant let me know. Lets track it here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-390 > Regards, > > Adel > > ________________________________ > From: Ted Ross <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 3:58:51 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Dispatch Router] Unexpected behavior when starting the > same dispatch router twice > > You should be aware that Alan Conway is working on converting the > Dispatch I/O layer to use Proton proactor and libuv. This might make > the port to Solaris (and Windows) much easier. > > -Ted > > > On 01/20/2017 09:54 AM, Adel Boutros wrote: > > I hope by that time I will have finished porting Dispatch Router to > > Solaris and submitted my patches. There have been a lot of changes > > since the last time we tried to compile 0.5 on Solaris :( > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Adel > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Ted Ross <[email protected]> > > Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 2:50:49 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [Dispatch Router] Unexpected behavior when starting > > the same dispatch router twice > > > > Actually, we haven't settled on a schedule for 0.8.0 yet. There > > are 90 > > issues assigned to 0.8.0 with 11 currently not resolved. > > > > I think mid-to-late February would be a good timeframe for this > > release. > > > > -Ted > > > > On 01/20/2017 08:39 AM, Ganesh Murthy wrote: > > > 0.8 is expected to come out around mid February. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Adel Boutros" <[email protected]> > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 8:31:40 AM > > > > Subject: Re: [Dispatch Router] Unexpected behavior when > > > > starting the same dispatch router twice > > > > > > > > Thanks Ted! > > > > > > > > > > > > Is 0.8 expected to come out soon? > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Adel > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > From: Ted Ross <[email protected]> > > > > Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 2:06:24 PM > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Subject: Re: [Dispatch Router] Unexpected behavior when > > > > starting the same > > > > dispatch router twice > > > > > > > > Adel, > > > > > > > > This was raised as a Jira > > > > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-55) and has > > > > been > > > > resolved for 0.8.0. There's some discussion captured on that > > > > issue. > > > > > > > > The short answer is: Yes, the second start should fail. > > > > > > > > -Ted > > > > > > > > On 01/20/2017 03:45 AM, Adel Boutros wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I was messing around with the Dispatch Router and noticed a > > > > > weird behavior. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If I start the dispatch router with a config file a first > > > > > time, the broker > > > > > is started correctly and is available. > > > > > > > > > > If I start the same dispatch router a second time with the > > > > > same config > > > > > file, it doesn't fail but in the logs it says the address is > > > > > already bound > > > > > but it continues processing the config file. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you confirm that the second start should crash the > > > > > dispatch router? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Logs on starting second dispatch router > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > Fri Jan 20 09:40:58 2017 DRIVER (error) bind: Address already > > > > > in use > > > > > Fri Jan 20 09:40:58 2017 AGENT (debug) Add entity: > > > > > ListenerEntity(addr=0.0.0.0, authenticatePeer=False, cost=1, > > > > > host=127.0.0.1, identity=listener/127.0.0.1:10501, > > > > > idleTimeoutSeconds=16, > > > > > maxFrameSize=16384, port=10501, requireEncryption=False, > > > > > requireSsl=False, > > > > > role=normal, saslMechanisms=ANONYMOUS, stripAnnotations=both, > > > > > type=org.apache.qpid.dispatch.listener) > > > > > Fri Jan 20 09:40:58 2017 POLICY (info) Policy configured > > > > > maximumConnections: 0, policyFolder: '', access rules > > > > > enabled: 'false' > > > > > Fri Jan 20 09:40:58 2017 AGENT (debug) Add entity: > > > > > Entity(defaultApplication=, defaultApplicationEnabled=False, > > > > > enableAccessRules=False, maximumConnections=0, policyFolder=, > > > > > type=org.apache.qpid.dispatch.policy) > > > > > .... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Adel > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > -------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > ------ > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > ---- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
