Il 04/12/2014 09:19, Sven Kieske ha scritto: > > > On 04/12/14 02:24, Robert Story wrote: >> On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 10:37:19 +0100 Sandro wrote: SB> Two different >> proposals have been made about above scheduling [3]: SB> 1) extend >> the cycle to 10 months for allowing to include a large SB> feature >> set 2) reduce the cycle to less than 6 months and split SB> >> features over 3.6 and 3.7 > >> I'd prefer a six-month cycle, so that the smaller features and >> enhancements come more quickly. > > If I read Sandro correct your choice is not in the given alternatives? > Would this be an third option? to neither decrease nor increase the > release cycle?
Keeping current is what we'll have if we won't have agreements :-) Let's wait a couple of weeks for gathering the full feature list and have a better picture of how much time it will take to get them in. > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
