On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 10:37:19 +0100 Sandro wrote: SB> Two different proposals have been made about above scheduling [3]: SB> 1) extend the cycle to 10 months for allowing to include a large SB> feature set 2) reduce the cycle to less than 6 months and split SB> features over 3.6 and 3.7
I'd prefer a six-month cycle, so that the smaller features and enhancements come more quickly. Robert -- Senior Software Engineer @ Parsons
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
