2014-09-07 2:58 GMT+02:00 Martin Groenescheij <mar...@groenescheij.com>:
> > On 7-9-2014 4:03, jd1008 wrote: > >> Katherine, >> you must understand that installing an app, any app, >> including the OS (windows, Linux, Apple OS X, Unix, Sun OS, HPUX ...etc), >> might or could open the door wide for backdoor entry >> into your computer, and/or install trojans that communicate >> to remote site(s) and download and install malware. >> There are many websites that you visit with your choice >> of browser, and they will install javascripts on your machine. >> Many many of these javascripts install malware on your system >> without your knowledge, let alone your consent. >> It is part of today's world and there is not much that can be done. >> >> Most websites will not work (i.e. display on your screen or allow >> interaction by you, such as clicking on a link, or filling a form or >> searching ...), without letting them install their javascripts on your >> computer. >> If anyone tells you that javascript cannot do that, know full well >> than person is either a liar or is ignorant of what javascripts can do. >> >> >> This doesn't help the poster with her problem for two reasons: > 1. The user isn't subscribed so she doesn't see your reply > To me it's very simple: If you want to read people's replies, subscribe, otherwise don't. So obviously the original poster in this case either didn't want to read any replies OR she prefers to search the archives for them. Anyway, that's up to her, not to us. If it was meant to be our problem, this list would be designed differently, clearly pointing out, in the message, not hidden in any kind of way, that this is written by someone who isn't subscribed. Clearly this isn't the case, so we shouldn't need to lift a finger to get that information. > 2. These comments doesn't tell what to do to solve the problem I agree to that one, though.
