On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 6:12 PM, NoOp <gl...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > On 07/23/2014 12:17 PM, JD wrote: >> created the desktop launcher: >> The launcher name is >> Open Office >> The command is: >> /usr/bin/ooffice > > Mine (from openoffice4.0-debian-menus_4.1-9764_all.deb: > <code> > #!/usr/bin/env xdg-open > > [Desktop Entry] > Version=1.0 > Type=Application > Terminal=false > Icon[en_US]=/opt/openoffice4/program/logo.png > Name[en_US]=OpenOffice > Comment[en_US]=ApacheOpenOffice > Exec=/opt/openoffice4/program/soffice > Name=OpenOffice > Comment=ApacheOpenOffice > Icon=/opt/openoffice4/program/logo > </code> > >> >> in /usr/bin, I have: >> $ ls -l /usr/bin/*office* >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root jd 32 Jul 23 12:18 /usr/bin/ooffice -> >> /opt/openoffice4/program/soffice > >> >> $ ls -l /opt/openoffice4/program/soffice >> -r-xr-xr-x 1 root root 3720 Apr 22 09:40 /opt/openoffice4/program/soffice >> >> But the launcher fails to launch open office. >> >> I see the following error in /home/jd/.xsession-errors: >> >> /usr/bin/ooffice: line 119: /opt/openoffice4/program/ooffice.bin: No such >> file or directory > > What do you have at line 119 in /usr/bin/ooffice? > > Unless you created ooffice.bin, none will exist. Line 119 in > /opt/openoffice4/program/soffice is > "$sd_prog/$sd_binary" "$@" & > >
Yes I know that. Issue is that the use should not have to. As I had already responded to another list member, for a script to execute $@ instead of what itself (the script) fallaciously calls itself (soffice), is totally misleading. It should execute soffice.bin instead of $@.bin. Otherwise it should be renamed something different. Just my opinion :) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org
