On Wednesday 23 July 2014 14:20:56 you wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Andrea Pescetti
> <pesce...@apache.org>
>
> wrote:
> > On 23/07/2014 JD wrote:
> >> in /usr/bin, I have:
> >> $ ls -l /usr/bin/*office*
> >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root jd      32 Jul 23 12:18 /usr/bin/ooffice ->
> >> /opt/openoffice4/program/soffice
> >
> > This is a symlink you put there, right?
>
> YES.
> Reason is that libreoffice has already stolen soffice in /usr/bin,
> and believe it or not, it has also stolen ooffice. Both of which link
> to libreoffice. So I broke the link /usr/bin/oofice -> libreoffice
> and made it link to
> /opt/openoffice4/program/soffice.
>
> >> However, if I execute /opt/openoffice4/program/soffice from the
> >> terminal, openoffice runs.
> >
> > The best way to launch OpenOffice is to make a shell alias. If this
> > is
>
> unacceptable to you, make a one-line shell script that in turn
> launches
>
> > /opt/openoffice4/program/soffice and it will work too.
>
> I have already created the shell alias. But I was hoping
> to launch it from gui because some attachments I get are MS doc
> types, and want to automagically open them with
> /bin/ooffice
> which at this point does no look possible.
>
> >> So, soffice script takes arg0 and blithely assumes that <arg0>.bin
>
> exists,
>
> >> and tries to exec it.
> >> Why should a script assume that? It is at least dangerous,
> >> especially if executed by a superuser!!
> >
> > This is how it works indeed: sd_binary=`basename "$0"`.bin
> > I haven't investigated it further, but if the .bin file needs to be
> > in
>
> the (non user-writable) "program" directory too this could be a
> mitigating factor. Development-related matters are discussed on the
> dev list http://openoffice.apache.org/mailing-lists.html where you
> can raise the issue or propose patches to the shell script.
> ​
>
> My past experience with dev lists have not proven fruitful, and thus
> I hesitated to subscribe to the dev list.
> ​

I download and install the packages from LO & AOO. Libreoffice installed 
this way uses the command : libreoffice4.2 %U, AOO uses soffice..both 
exist together..I just don't get to use the distro packages for 
LO..fine by me.
-- 
Peace,

Greg

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Reply via email to