For what it's worth, I've had problems switching from 8 to 11, too. But
they've been minor glitches. But I barely know JavaFX and I don't use it at
all, I've been quite satisfied with AWT/Swing for my purposes. I've used
Eclipse and found it lacking. IntelliJ's good, but I don't need an IDE to
auto-complete "try" or "val" for me. I've found parameter auto-complete in
NetBeans to be generally much more helpful.

Also, I should note that I never did delete NetBeans 8.2 from my MacBook,
even though I almost never used it after upgrading to 11.1. I figured other
people were sure to have problems in the transition, and I think my luck is
such that I too would have had problems if I had deleted 8.2.

Al

On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 12:13 PM Chuck Davis <cjgun...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Paul, many of us "feel your pain" with what Oracle did to JavaFX.  But all
> is not lost.  Take a look here:  http://netbeans.apache.org/kb/docs/java/
>
> Scroll down to the JavaFX section and click on the first item.  You will
> see how completely easy it is to develop JavaFX with Netbeans and Maven.
> Of course, deployment is a different story but Gluon has some good
> information about how to install JavaFX.  Once installed, it's installed --
> until you want to upgrade to the next release and then it is also quite
> simple.  The main difference is defining the module path.
>
> It's a terrible shame all the big players have decided a browser is a
> "good enough" interface for users.  For those of us old enough to remember
> how efficient a character interface was to get work done a browser will
> just never be adequate.  But, as you know, we can get pretty close to that
> efficiency with either Swing or JavaFX.
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 8:16 AM Paul Szudzik <pszud...@throwarock.com>
> wrote:
>
>>     I have been a NetBeans user since inception.  I am retired now, but
>> when I worked, I was one of the few people in my company that was an
>> advocate of NetBeans, and used it instead of the company line, Eclipse
>> product.
>>
>>     Retired now for 10+ years, I used NetBeans to develop my products,
>> and really getting involved in JavaFX big time. I love the cross platform
>> capability, and use it on both Ubuntu and Windows.  Raspberry Pi, no
>> problem.  Windows, no problem.  I loved it. Then boom, Oracle takes JavaFX
>> out of the mix, and NetBeans and I start having major problems. It gets
>> harder and harder to use NetBeans with it’s incompatibility with JavaFX
>> without going through hoops every single time we upgrade.  I have a ton of
>> projects that are a major pain to go back to without having to dance on a
>> high wire to get to work.  And I am still not sure I can do this anymore.
>>
>>     I have been a computer programmer, designer and architect for well
>> over 53+ years.  I have see many systems come and go, many IDE rise and
>> fall, many languages surface and crash.  The move to Maven is beyond my
>> scope now.  I want to program, not to have to regenerate and rehash my
>> build system every release.  I have tried to move over to 11, and mostly
>> failed.  I have too many modules and programs in play to hack this out.
>>
>>     It would have been great if NetBeans had a seamless transition ,
>> built in conversions for old projects to current format.  Seriously, I
>> would love to be on that train.  But nope, it seems too much handholding
>> and dancing.  I currently have a half dozen active Beta’s  that are stuck
>> in a NetBeans 8.1.x / Java 8 scenario, that I want to port into NetBeans
>> 11.3 / Java 13+ area, but really don’t believe that it is 1: Easy, 2:
>> Lasting, 3: Enduring more than another release.
>>
>>     I still have reported bugs > 5 years old that are not resolved.
>>
>>     I see streams of notes that are asking questions about
>> compatibility.  ( The latest straw is the Ant image ... )  I see how once
>> the major players in NetBeans get on a wagon, the trail off is almost
>> impossible.  If you’re new to NetBeans, perhaps this is a good trend.  If
>> you have dealt with NetBeans as long as I have.. it becomes more than just
>> an annoyance.  It almost easier to find another IDE to settle in on, as the
>> amount of work to transfer 100+ projects, probably more, from old NetBeans
>> to new NetBeans is formidable.
>>
>>     Maybe a 3rd party can produce a product that 100% transfer old
>> projects to Maven..  I’d rather develop and code than mess around with
>> trying to make things move up the NetBeans chain anymore..  Coding is fun,
>> transitioning is not. I am 100% committed to JavaFX, I like the layouts, I
>> like what Gluon has done, I like the look and feel.
>>
>>     NetBeans 8 –> NetBeans 11+ –> convert ...
>>
>>     I would normally apologize for my rant, but nope. I feel that I am
>> now progressing backwards...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

-- 
Alonso del Arte
Author at SmashWords.com
<https://www.smashwords.com/profile/view/AlonsoDelarte>
Musician at ReverbNation.com <http://www.reverbnation.com/alonsodelarte>

Reply via email to