I think this plugin is more like a assembly plugin with launch4j specifics. am i wrong?
On 10/13/06, Wayne Fay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This sounds best to me too. Perhaps create 5 artifacts -- one for each of the 4 platforms, for people who are strictly Windows shops etc; plus one with all platforms bundled in it? Wayne On 10/13/06, pjungwir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > dan tran wrote: > > > > does the build need to stay on the supported platform to build the > > executable? > > > > I'm not exactly sure what you're asking. But if your project uses a solaris > launch4j plugin, then you checkout the project on mas os x, building the exe > will fail. I had envisioned people using all four and choosing one based on > the host system via profiles. But I suppose the plugin could include the > binaries from all four OSes and decide itself. . . . Actually, that's not > such a bad idea! Heh heh heh.... > > Paul > > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/plugin-naming-advice-tf2439526.html#a6804237 > Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
