i think there are works already done for launch4j plugin
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-176 On 10/13/06, pjungwir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello, I'm writing a plugin for the launch4j tool. This tool wraps jar files in windows executables so you don't have to deal with finding a jre, setting your classpath, etc. The distribution is a little bit different depending on whether you're running on linux, windows, solaris, or os x. I don't see any way around distributing the plugin four different ways. I'll just include a "-linux-" or "-win32-" or whatever in the name somewhere. So I'm wondering: is one part of the name better than another? Should I make this part of the groupId, the artifiactId, or the version? At first I thought the version was the best way to go, but I'm worried about whether this will confuse maven's efforts to get the latest version. Users should be able to say "get me the latest windows version" or whatever. So I'm thinking the artifactId is the best place. What do others think? Thanks, Paul -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/plugin-naming-advice-tf2439526.html#a6802682 Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
