> >> According to "BetterBuildsWithMaven.pdf" I switched from
> >> <packaging>ejb</packaging> to <packaging>ejb3</packaging>. Unfortunately
> >
> > change it to jar.
> > Alex
>
> You mean there is no difference between ejb3 and jar? For what is ejb3
> good then?
no, I mean the packaging is the same. It is just a jar with a persistence.xml 
file. the Ejb3 extension/packaging comes from an early draft of the spec. 
That didn't make to the final draft.
The packaging and what ejb3 are good for are unrelated :-)
alex

Attachment: pgpw6Jzc1WfHU.pgp
Description: PGP signature



Reply via email to