Well Maven doc isn't exactly great since its not really centralized.
But as many have stated custom packaging part of the EJB3 spec never made it and as such, the JAR plugin is your best bet! :D -aps On 9/8/06, Markus KARG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alexandre Russel wrote: >>>> According to "BetterBuildsWithMaven.pdf" I switched from >>>> <packaging>ejb</packaging> to <packaging>ejb3</packaging>. Unfortunately >>>> >>> change it to jar. >>> Alex >>> >> You mean there is no difference between ejb3 and jar? For what is ejb3 >> good then? >> > no, I mean the packaging is the same. It is just a jar with a persistence.xml > file. the Ejb3 extension/packaging comes from an early draft of the spec. > That didn't make to the final draft. > The packaging and what ejb3 are good for are unrelated :-) > alex > So there actually is no more ejb3 plugin but users shall use jar? Cool. Would be great if this would be found in the description of the ejb plugin on the web (or in the "BetterBuildsWithMaven.pdf") so people do not spend days with boring questions like mine. ;-)
-- "What lies behind us and what lies in front of us is of little concern to what lies within us." -Ralph Waldo Emerson
