we have not had a new beta for release plugin for a long time, perhaps a the
snapshot would solve this issue?

-D


On 4/11/06, Todd Nine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This definitely seems like a bug, I'm glad someone else has seen this
> behavior, now we can compare the system configuration of two independent
> users.  Here is my configuration, can you please let me know your
> configuration so we can determine the common problem and report a bug?
>
> OS: Windows 2k
> Java Version: 1.4.2_09 or 1.5.0_04
> Maven 2.0.2
> org.apache.maven.plugins.maven-release-plugin version: 2.0-beta3
> CVS executable : cvs.exe , part of the Tortoise CVS package
> SSH executable: plink
> Key manager :pageant
>
>
> Thanks,
> Todd
>
>
>
> On 4/11/06, Gelkand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > I am using maven-2.0.4 (on WindowsXP, CVS on Solaris) and have exactly
> the
> > same problem during release:prepare of a multiproject build. The child
> > poms
> > were updated and checked in, the master pom is updated (and so locally
> > changed), but not checked in before tagging the source tree. This leads
> > during tagging to the failure with the message ... pom.xml is locally
> > modified .... Seems to be a bug ...
> >
> > As a workaround, i manually checked the master pom into CVS, performs
> > again
> > the release:prepare(which successfully uses the before created
> > release.properties) and the tagging is successfull, (At the end the
> master
> > pom with the new snapshot version number is again not checked into CVS,
> > just
> > the child poms with the new snapshot version numbers are checked into
> CVS,
> > i
> > do not know if this is a feature or a bug)
> >
> > Greetings, Gelkand
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> >
> http://www.nabble.com/Question-about-release-plugin-on-pom-archtype-t1403232.html#a3867837
> > Sent from the Maven - Users forum at Nabble.com.
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to