Diego, Since this question is not Open MPI specific, Stack Overflow (or similar forum) is a better place to ask. Make sure you first read https://stackoverflow.com/help/mcve
Feel free to post us a link to your question. Cheers, Gilles On Monday, August 13, 2018, Diego Avesani <diego.aves...@gmail.com> wrote: > dear Jeff, dear all, > > its my fault. > > Can I send an attachment? > thanks > > Diego > > > On 13 August 2018 at 19:06, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquy...@cisco.com> > wrote: > >> On Aug 12, 2018, at 2:18 PM, Diego Avesani <diego.aves...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > Dear all, Dear Jeff, >> > I have three communicator: >> > >> > the standard one: >> > MPI_COMM_WORLD >> > >> > and other two: >> > MPI_LOCAL_COMM >> > MPI_MASTER_COMM >> > >> > a sort of two-level MPI. >> > >> > Suppose to have 8 threats, >> > I use 4 threats for run the same problem with different value. These >> are the LOCAL_COMM. >> > In addition I have a MPI_MASTER_COMM to allow the master of each group >> to communicate. >> >> I don't understand what you're trying to convey here, sorry. Can you >> draw it, perhaps? >> >> (I am assuming you mean "threads", not "threats") >> >> > These give me some problem. >> > >> > >> > For example, I have to exit to a cycle, according to a check: >> > >> > IF(counter.GE.npercstop*nParticles)THEN >> > flag2exit=1 >> > WRITE(*,*) '-Warning PSO has been exit' >> > EXIT pso_cycle >> > ENDIF >> > >> > But this is difficult to do since I have to exit only after all the >> threats inside a set have finish their task. >> > >> > Do you have some suggestions? >> > Do you need other information? >> >> -- >> Jeff Squyres >> jsquy...@cisco.com >> >> >
_______________________________________________ users mailing list users@lists.open-mpi.org https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/users
