dear Jeff, dear all, its my fault.
Can I send an attachment? thanks Diego On 13 August 2018 at 19:06, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote: > On Aug 12, 2018, at 2:18 PM, Diego Avesani <diego.aves...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Dear all, Dear Jeff, > > I have three communicator: > > > > the standard one: > > MPI_COMM_WORLD > > > > and other two: > > MPI_LOCAL_COMM > > MPI_MASTER_COMM > > > > a sort of two-level MPI. > > > > Suppose to have 8 threats, > > I use 4 threats for run the same problem with different value. These are > the LOCAL_COMM. > > In addition I have a MPI_MASTER_COMM to allow the master of each group > to communicate. > > I don't understand what you're trying to convey here, sorry. Can you draw > it, perhaps? > > (I am assuming you mean "threads", not "threats") > > > These give me some problem. > > > > > > For example, I have to exit to a cycle, according to a check: > > > > IF(counter.GE.npercstop*nParticles)THEN > > flag2exit=1 > > WRITE(*,*) '-Warning PSO has been exit' > > EXIT pso_cycle > > ENDIF > > > > But this is difficult to do since I have to exit only after all the > threats inside a set have finish their task. > > > > Do you have some suggestions? > > Do you need other information? > > -- > Jeff Squyres > jsquy...@cisco.com > >
_______________________________________________ users mailing list users@lists.open-mpi.org https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/users
