Mark - this is now available in master. Will look at what might be required to bring it to 2.0
> On Feb 15, 2017, at 5:49 AM, r...@open-mpi.org wrote: > > >> On Feb 15, 2017, at 5:45 AM, Mark Dixon <m.c.di...@leeds.ac.uk> wrote: >> >> On Wed, 15 Feb 2017, r...@open-mpi.org wrote: >> >>> Ah, yes - I know what the problem is. We weren’t expecting a PE value of 1 >>> - the logic is looking expressly for values > 1 as we hadn’t anticipated >>> this use-case. >> >> Is it a sensible use-case, or am I crazy? > > Not crazy, I’d say. The expected way of doing it would be “--map-by socket > --bind-to core”. However, I can see why someone might expect pe=1 to work. > >> >>> I can make that change. I’m off to a workshop for the next day or so, but >>> can probably do this on the plane. >> >> You're a star - thanks :) >> >> Mark_______________________________________________ >> users mailing list >> users@lists.open-mpi.org >> https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users@lists.open-mpi.org > https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ users mailing list users@lists.open-mpi.org https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users
