> On Feb 15, 2017, at 5:45 AM, Mark Dixon <m.c.di...@leeds.ac.uk> wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Feb 2017, r...@open-mpi.org wrote: > >> Ah, yes - I know what the problem is. We weren’t expecting a PE value of 1 - >> the logic is looking expressly for values > 1 as we hadn’t anticipated this >> use-case. > > Is it a sensible use-case, or am I crazy?
Not crazy, I’d say. The expected way of doing it would be “--map-by socket --bind-to core”. However, I can see why someone might expect pe=1 to work. > >> I can make that change. I’m off to a workshop for the next day or so, but >> can probably do this on the plane. > > You're a star - thanks :) > > Mark_______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users@lists.open-mpi.org > https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ users mailing list users@lists.open-mpi.org https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users
