On Dec 1, 2014, at 12:47 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
> I’m not entirely familiar with the thinking behind it, but it appears that > some MCA params are intended solely for reporting purposes and are therefore > not really “settable”. The “have_knem_support” is one such example, and it > sounds like you may have found some others. Correct. We call these "info" MCA params. They've been around for a long, long time, but I think they may have gotten renamed (at least in the output) in the MCA revamp in the 1.7/1.8 series. Perhaps we need less confusing output in this area. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
