Dear developers and users,

I am trying to run OSU benchmark tests (like osu_latency, osu_bw, etc)
 with Open MPI. While I was able to run the tests with both versions
(1.6.5, 1.8.1, same default build), I got disparate performance results.
Please see data below. I wonder what reason would cause the performance
difference.

And also, I was trying to run the tests with latest release 1.8.2, got the
warning like below, and got the results similar to version 1.8.1. How can I
avoid this warning?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
WARNING: a request was made to bind a process. While the system
supports binding the process itself, at least one node does NOT
support binding memory to the process location.

  Node:  hostname

This is a warning only; your job will continue, though performance may
be degraded.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks,
Na Zhang

*Version 1.6.5*
# OSU MPI Latency Test v4.3
# Size          Latency (us)
0                       1.83
1                       1.11
2                       1.11
4                       1.11
8                       1.13
16                      1.15
32                      1.17
64                      1.22
128                     1.54
256                     1.73
512                     1.90
1024                    2.24
2048                    2.93
4096                    3.59
8192                    4.96
16384                   7.81
32768                  11.22
65536                  18.18
131072                 32.10
262144                 59.91
524288                115.56
1048576               226.84
2097152               449.71
4194304               894.75

*Version 1.8.1*
# OSU MPI Latency Test v4.3
# Size          Latency (us)
0                       0.22
1                       0.27
2                       0.27
4                       0.27
8                       0.27
16                      0.28
32                      0.28
64                      0.31
128                     0.44
256                     0.47
512                     0.48
1024                    0.60
2048                    0.83
4096                    1.30
8192                    1.95
16384                   3.45
32768                   5.79
65536                   8.88
131072                 15.79
262144                 28.78
524288                 53.50
1048576               104.09
2097152               202.54
4194304               398.43

Reply via email to