Hi Nisha

I'm sorry if my questions appear abrasive - I'm just a little frustrated at the 
communication bottleneck as I can't seem to get a clear picture of your 
situation. So you really don't need to keep calling me "sir" :-)

The error you are hitting is very unusual - it means that the processes are 
able to make a connection, but are failing to correctly complete a simple 
handshake exchange of their process identifications. There are only a few ways 
that can happen, and I'm trying to get you to test for them.

So let's try and see if we can narrow this down. You mention that it works on 
some machines, but not all. Is this consistent - i.e., is it always the same 
machines that work, and the same ones that generate the error? If you exclude 
the ones that show the error, does it work? If so, what is different about 
those nodes? Are they a different architecture?


On Apr 3, 2014, at 11:09 PM, Nisha Dhankher -M.Tech(CSE) 
<nishadhankher-coaese...@pau.edu> wrote:

> sir
> smae virt-manager is bein used by all pc's.no i did n't enable 
> openmpi-hetro.Yes openmpi version is same in all through same kickstart file.
> ok...actually sir...rocks itself installed,configured openmpi and mpich on it 
> own through hpc roll.
> 
> 
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
> 
> On Apr 3, 2014, at 8:03 PM, Nisha Dhankher -M.Tech(CSE) 
> <nishadhankher-coaese...@pau.edu> wrote:
> 
>> thankyou Ralph.
>> Yes cluster is heterogenous...
> 
> And did you configure OMPI --enable-heterogeneous? And are you running it 
> with ---hetero-nodes? What version of OMPI are you using anyway?
> 
> Note that we don't care if the host pc's are hetero - what we care about is 
> the VM. If all the VMs are the same, then it shouldn't matter. However, most 
> VM technologies don't handle hetero hardware very well - i.e., you can't 
> emulate an x86 architecture on top of a Sparc or Power chip or vice versa.
> 
> 
>> And i haven't made compute nodes on direct physical nodes (pc's) becoz in 
>> college it is not possible to take whole lab of 32 pc's for your work  so i 
>> ran on vm.
> 
> Yes, but at least it would let you test the setup to run MPI across even a 
> couple of pc's - this is simple debugging practice.
> 
>> In Rocks cluster, frontend give the same kickstart to all the pc's so 
>> openmpi version should be same i guess.
> 
> Guess? or know? Makes a difference - might be worth testing.
> 
>> Sir 
>> mpiformatdb is a command to distribute database fragments to different 
>> compute nodes after partitioning od database.
>> And sir have you done mpiblast ?
> 
> Nope - but that isn't the issue, is it? The issue is with the MPI setup.
> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
>> What is "mpiformatdb"? We don't have an MPI database in our system, and I 
>> have no idea what that command means
>> 
>> As for that error - it means that the identifier we exchange between 
>> processes is failing to be recognized. This could mean a couple of things:
>> 
>> 1. the OMPI version on the two ends is different - could be you aren't 
>> getting the right paths set on the various machines
>> 
>> 2. the cluster is heterogeneous
>> 
>> You say you have "virtual nodes" running on various PC's? That would be an 
>> unusual setup - VM's can be problematic given the way they handle TCP 
>> connections, so that might be another source of the problem if my 
>> understanding of your setup is correct. Have you tried running this across 
>> the PCs directly - i.e., without any VMs?
>> 
>> 
>> On Apr 3, 2014, at 10:13 AM, Nisha Dhankher -M.Tech(CSE) 
>> <nishadhankher-coaese...@pau.edu> wrote:
>> 
>>> i first formatted my database with mpiformatdb command then i ran command :
>>> mpirun -np 64 -machinefile mf mpiblast -d all.fas -p blastn -i query.fas -o 
>>> output.txt
>>> but then it gave this error 113 from some hosts and continue to run for 
>>> other but with no  results even after 2 hours lapsed.....on rocks 6.0 
>>> cluster with 12 virtual nodes on pc's ...2 on each using virt-manger , 1 gb 
>>> ram to each
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Nisha Dhankher -M.Tech(CSE) 
>>> <nishadhankher-coaese...@pau.edu> wrote:
>>> i also made machine file which contain ip adresses of all compute nodes + 
>>> .ncbirc file for path to mpiblast and shared ,local storage path....
>>> Sir
>>> I ran the same command of mpirun on my college supercomputer 8 nodes each 
>>> having 24 processors but it just running....gave no result uptill 3 hours...
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Nisha Dhankher -M.Tech(CSE) 
>>> <nishadhankher-coaese...@pau.edu> wrote:
>>> i first formatted my database with mpiformatdb command then i ran command :
>>> mpirun -np 64 -machinefile mf mpiblast -d all.fas -p blastn -i query.fas -o 
>>> output.txt
>>> but then it gave this error 113 from some hosts and continue to run for 
>>> other but with results even after 2 hours lapsed.....on rocks 6.0 cluster 
>>> with 12 virtual nodes on pc's ...2 on each using virt-manger , 1 gb ram to 
>>> each
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
>>> I'm having trouble understanding your note, so perhaps I am getting this 
>>> wrong. Let's see if I can figure out what you said:
>>> 
>>> * your perl command fails with "no route to host" - but I don't see any 
>>> host in your cmd. Maybe I'm just missing something.
>>> 
>>> * you tried running a couple of "mpirun", but the mpirun command wasn't 
>>> recognized? Is that correct?
>>> 
>>> * you then ran mpiblast and it sounds like it successfully started the 
>>> processes, but then one aborted? Was there an error message beyond just the 
>>> -1 return status?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Apr 2, 2014, at 11:17 PM, Nisha Dhankher -M.Tech(CSE) 
>>> <nishadhankher-coaese...@pau.edu> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> error btl_tcp_endpint.c: 638 connection failed due to error 113
>>>> 
>>>> In openmpi: this error came when i run my mpiblast program on rocks 
>>>> cluster.Connect to hosts failed on ip 10.1.255.236,10.1.255.244 . And when 
>>>> i run following command linux_shell$ perl -e 'die$!=113' this msg comes: 
>>>> "No route to host at -e line 1." shell$ mpirun --mca btl ^tcp shell$ 
>>>> mpirun --mca btl_tcp_if_include eth1,eth2 shell$ mpirun --mca 
>>>> btl_tcp_if_include 10.1.255.244 was also executed but it did nt recognized 
>>>> these commands....nd aborted.... what should i do...? When i run my 
>>>> mpiblast program for the frst time then it give mpi_abort error...bailing 
>>>> out of signal -1 on rank 2 processor...then i removed my public ethernet 
>>>> cable....and then give btl_tcp endpint error 113....
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> users mailing list
>>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> us...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> us...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> us...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> us...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users

Reply via email to