I'm having trouble seeing why it is failing, so I added some more debug output. Could you run the failure case again with -mca rmaps_base_verbose 10?
Thanks Ralph On Feb 27, 2014, at 6:11 PM, tmish...@jcity.maeda.co.jp wrote: > > > Just checking the difference, not so significant meaning... > > Anyway, I guess it's due to the behavior when slot counts is missing > (regarded as slots=1) and it's oversubscribed unintentionally. > > I'm going out now, so I can't verify it quickly. If I provide the > correct slot counts, it wll work, I guess. How do you think? > > Tetsuya > >> "restore" in what sense? >> >> On Feb 27, 2014, at 4:10 PM, tmish...@jcity.maeda.co.jp wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Hi Ralph, this is just for your information. >>> >>> I tried to restore previous orte_rmaps_rr_byobj. Then I gets the result >>> below with this command line: >>> >>> mpirun -np 8 -host node05,node06 -report-bindings -map-by socket:pe=2 >>> -display-map -bind-to core:overload-allowed ~/mis/openmpi/demos/myprog >>> Data for JOB [31184,1] offset 0 >>> >>> ======================== JOB MAP ======================== >>> >>> Data for node: node05 Num slots: 1 Max slots: 0 Num procs: 7 >>> Process OMPI jobid: [31184,1] App: 0 Process rank: 0 >>> Process OMPI jobid: [31184,1] App: 0 Process rank: 2 >>> Process OMPI jobid: [31184,1] App: 0 Process rank: 4 >>> Process OMPI jobid: [31184,1] App: 0 Process rank: 6 >>> Process OMPI jobid: [31184,1] App: 0 Process rank: 1 >>> Process OMPI jobid: [31184,1] App: 0 Process rank: 3 >>> Process OMPI jobid: [31184,1] App: 0 Process rank: 5 >>> >>> Data for node: node06 Num slots: 1 Max slots: 0 Num procs: 1 >>> Process OMPI jobid: [31184,1] App: 0 Process rank: 7 >>> >>> ============================================================= >>> [node06.cluster:18857] MCW rank 7 bound to socket 0[core 0[hwt 0]], > socket >>> 0[core 1[hwt 0]]: [B/B/./.][./././.] >>> [node05.cluster:21399] MCW rank 3 bound to socket 1[core 6[hwt 0]], > socket >>> 1[core 7[hwt 0]]: [./././.][././B/B] >>> [node05.cluster:21399] MCW rank 4 bound to socket 0[core 0[hwt 0]], > socket >>> 0[core 1[hwt 0]]: [B/B/./.][./././.] >>> [node05.cluster:21399] MCW rank 5 bound to socket 1[core 4[hwt 0]], > socket >>> 1[core 5[hwt 0]]: [./././.][B/B/./.] >>> [node05.cluster:21399] MCW rank 6 bound to socket 0[core 2[hwt 0]], > socket >>> 0[core 3[hwt 0]]: [././B/B][./././.] >>> [node05.cluster:21399] MCW rank 0 bound to socket 0[core 0[hwt 0]], > socket >>> 0[core 1[hwt 0]]: [B/B/./.][./././.] >>> [node05.cluster:21399] MCW rank 1 bound to socket 1[core 4[hwt 0]], > socket >>> 1[core 5[hwt 0]]: [./././.][B/B/./.] >>> [node05.cluster:21399] MCW rank 2 bound to socket 0[core 2[hwt 0]], > socket >>> 0[core 3[hwt 0]]: [././B/B][./././.] >>> .... >>> >>> >>> Then I add "-hostfile pbs_hosts" and the result is: >>> >>> [mishima@manage work]$cat pbs_hosts >>> node05 slots=8 >>> node06 slots=8 >>> [mishima@manage work]$ mpirun -np 8 -hostfile ~/work/pbs_hosts >>> -report-bindings -map-by socket:pe=2 -display-map >>> ~/mis/openmpi/demos/myprog >>> Data for JOB [30254,1] offset 0 >>> >>> ======================== JOB MAP ======================== >>> >>> Data for node: node05 Num slots: 8 Max slots: 0 Num procs: 4 >>> Process OMPI jobid: [30254,1] App: 0 Process rank: 0 >>> Process OMPI jobid: [30254,1] App: 0 Process rank: 2 >>> Process OMPI jobid: [30254,1] App: 0 Process rank: 1 >>> Process OMPI jobid: [30254,1] App: 0 Process rank: 3 >>> >>> Data for node: node06 Num slots: 8 Max slots: 0 Num procs: 4 >>> Process OMPI jobid: [30254,1] App: 0 Process rank: 4 >>> Process OMPI jobid: [30254,1] App: 0 Process rank: 6 >>> Process OMPI jobid: [30254,1] App: 0 Process rank: 5 >>> Process OMPI jobid: [30254,1] App: 0 Process rank: 7 >>> >>> ============================================================= >>> [node05.cluster:21501] MCW rank 2 bound to socket 0[core 2[hwt 0]], > socket >>> 0[core 3[hwt 0]]: [././B/B][./././.] >>> [node05.cluster:21501] MCW rank 3 bound to socket 1[core 6[hwt 0]], > socket >>> 1[core 7[hwt 0]]: [./././.][././B/B] >>> [node05.cluster:21501] MCW rank 0 bound to socket 0[core 0[hwt 0]], > socket >>> 0[core 1[hwt 0]]: [B/B/./.][./././.] >>> [node05.cluster:21501] MCW rank 1 bound to socket 1[core 4[hwt 0]], > socket >>> 1[core 5[hwt 0]]: [./././.][B/B/./.] >>> [node06.cluster:18935] MCW rank 6 bound to socket 0[core 2[hwt 0]], > socket >>> 0[core 3[hwt 0]]: [././B/B][./././.] >>> [node06.cluster:18935] MCW rank 7 bound to socket 1[core 6[hwt 0]], > socket >>> 1[core 7[hwt 0]]: [./././.][././B/B] >>> [node06.cluster:18935] MCW rank 4 bound to socket 0[core 0[hwt 0]], > socket >>> 0[core 1[hwt 0]]: [B/B/./.][./././.] >>> [node06.cluster:18935] MCW rank 5 bound to socket 1[core 4[hwt 0]], > socket >>> 1[core 5[hwt 0]]: [./././.][B/B/./.] >>> .... >>> >>> >>> I think previous version's behavior would be close to what I expect. >>> >>> Tetusya >>> >>>> They have 4 cores/socket and 2 sockets, totally 4 X 2 = 8 cores, each. >>>> >>>> Here is the output of lstopo. >>>> >>>> mishima@manage round_robin]$ rsh node05 >>>> Last login: Tue Feb 18 15:10:15 from manage >>>> [mishima@node05 ~]$ lstopo >>>> Machine (32GB) >>>> NUMANode L#0 (P#0 16GB) + Socket L#0 + L3 L#0 (6144KB) >>>> L2 L#0 (512KB) + L1d L#0 (64KB) + L1i L#0 (64KB) + Core L#0 + PU L#0 >>>> (P#0) >>>> L2 L#1 (512KB) + L1d L#1 (64KB) + L1i L#1 (64KB) + Core L#1 + PU L#1 >>>> (P#1) >>>> L2 L#2 (512KB) + L1d L#2 (64KB) + L1i L#2 (64KB) + Core L#2 + PU L#2 >>>> (P#2) >>>> L2 L#3 (512KB) + L1d L#3 (64KB) + L1i L#3 (64KB) + Core L#3 + PU L#3 >>>> (P#3) >>>> NUMANode L#1 (P#1 16GB) + Socket L#1 + L3 L#1 (6144KB) >>>> L2 L#4 (512KB) + L1d L#4 (64KB) + L1i L#4 (64KB) + Core L#4 + PU L#4 >>>> (P#4) >>>> L2 L#5 (512KB) + L1d L#5 (64KB) + L1i L#5 (64KB) + Core L#5 + PU L#5 >>>> (P#5) >>>> L2 L#6 (512KB) + L1d L#6 (64KB) + L1i L#6 (64KB) + Core L#6 + PU L#6 >>>> (P#6) >>>> L2 L#7 (512KB) + L1d L#7 (64KB) + L1i L#7 (64KB) + Core L#7 + PU L#7 >>>> (P#7) >>>> .... >>>> >>>> I foucused on byobj_span and bynode. I didn't notice byobj was > modified, >>>> sorry. >>>> >>>> Tetsuya >>>> >>>>> Hmmm..what does your node look like again (sockets and cores)? >>>>> >>>>> On Feb 27, 2014, at 3:19 PM, tmish...@jcity.maeda.co.jp wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Ralph, I'm afraid to say your new "map-by obj" causes another >>>> problem. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have overload message with this command line as shown below: >>>>>> >>>>>> mpirun -np 8 -host node05,node06 -report-bindings -map-by > socket:pe=2 >>>>>> -display-map ~/mis/openmpi/d >>>>>> emos/myprog >>>>>> >>>> >>> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> A request was made to bind to that would result in binding more >>>>>> processes than cpus on a resource: >>>>>> >>>>>> Bind to: CORE >>>>>> Node: node05 >>>>>> #processes: 2 >>>>>> #cpus: 1 >>>>>> >>>>>> You can override this protection by adding the "overload-allowed" >>>>>> option to your binding directive. >>>>>> >>>> >>> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> Then, I add "-bind-to core:overload-allowed" to see what happenes. >>>>>> >>>>>> mpirun -np 8 -host node05,node06 -report-bindings -map-by > socket:pe=2 >>>>>> -display-map -bind-to core:o >>>>>> verload-allowed ~/mis/openmpi/demos/myprog >>>>>> Data for JOB [14398,1] offset 0 >>>>>> >>>>>> ======================== JOB MAP ======================== >>>>>> >>>>>> Data for node: node05 Num slots: 1 Max slots: 0 Num procs: 4 >>>>>> Process OMPI jobid: [14398,1] App: 0 Process rank: 0 >>>>>> Process OMPI jobid: [14398,1] App: 0 Process rank: 1 >>>>>> Process OMPI jobid: [14398,1] App: 0 Process rank: 2 >>>>>> Process OMPI jobid: [14398,1] App: 0 Process rank: 3 >>>>>> >>>>>> Data for node: node06 Num slots: 1 Max slots: 0 Num procs: 4 >>>>>> Process OMPI jobid: [14398,1] App: 0 Process rank: 4 >>>>>> Process OMPI jobid: [14398,1] App: 0 Process rank: 5 >>>>>> Process OMPI jobid: [14398,1] App: 0 Process rank: 6 >>>>>> Process OMPI jobid: [14398,1] App: 0 Process rank: 7 >>>>>> >>>>>> ============================================================= >>>>>> [node06.cluster:18443] MCW rank 6 bound to socket 0[core 0[hwt 0]], >>>> socket >>>>>> 0[core 1[hwt 0]]: [B/B/./.][./././.] >>>>>> [node05.cluster:20901] MCW rank 2 bound to socket 0[core 0[hwt 0]], >>>> socket >>>>>> 0[core 1[hwt 0]]: [B/B/./.][./././.] >>>>>> [node06.cluster:18443] MCW rank 7 bound to socket 0[core 2[hwt 0]], >>>> socket >>>>>> 0[core 3[hwt 0]]: [././B/B][./././.] >>>>>> [node05.cluster:20901] MCW rank 3 bound to socket 0[core 2[hwt 0]], >>>> socket >>>>>> 0[core 3[hwt 0]]: [././B/B][./././.] >>>>>> [node06.cluster:18443] MCW rank 4 bound to socket 0[core 0[hwt 0]], >>>> socket >>>>>> 0[core 1[hwt 0]]: [B/B/./.][./././.] >>>>>> [node05.cluster:20901] MCW rank 0 bound to socket 0[core 0[hwt 0]], >>>> socket >>>>>> 0[core 1[hwt 0]]: [B/B/./.][./././.] >>>>>> [node06.cluster:18443] MCW rank 5 bound to socket 0[core 2[hwt 0]], >>>> socket >>>>>> 0[core 3[hwt 0]]: [././B/B][./././.] >>>>>> [node05.cluster:20901] MCW rank 1 bound to socket 0[core 2[hwt 0]], >>>> socket >>>>>> 0[core 3[hwt 0]]: [././B/B][./././.] >>>>>> Hello world from process 4 of 8 >>>>>> Hello world from process 2 of 8 >>>>>> Hello world from process 6 of 8 >>>>>> Hello world from process 0 of 8 >>>>>> Hello world from process 5 of 8 >>>>>> Hello world from process 1 of 8 >>>>>> Hello world from process 7 of 8 >>>>>> Hello world from process 3 of 8 >>>>>> >>>>>> When I add "map-by obj:span", it works fine: >>>>>> >>>>>> mpirun -np 8 -host node05,node06 -report-bindings -map-by >>>> socket:pe=2,span >>>>>> -display-map ~/mis/ope >>>>>> nmpi/demos/myprog >>>>>> Data for JOB [14703,1] offset 0 >>>>>> >>>>>> ======================== JOB MAP ======================== >>>>>> >>>>>> Data for node: node05 Num slots: 1 Max slots: 0 Num procs: 4 >>>>>> Process OMPI jobid: [14703,1] App: 0 Process rank: 0 >>>>>> Process OMPI jobid: [14703,1] App: 0 Process rank: 2 >>>>>> Process OMPI jobid: [14703,1] App: 0 Process rank: 1 >>>>>> Process OMPI jobid: [14703,1] App: 0 Process rank: 3 >>>>>> >>>>>> Data for node: node06 Num slots: 1 Max slots: 0 Num procs: 4 >>>>>> Process OMPI jobid: [14703,1] App: 0 Process rank: 4 >>>>>> Process OMPI jobid: [14703,1] App: 0 Process rank: 6 >>>>>> Process OMPI jobid: [14703,1] App: 0 Process rank: 5 >>>>>> Process OMPI jobid: [14703,1] App: 0 Process rank: 7 >>>>>> >>>>>> ============================================================= >>>>>> [node06.cluster:18491] MCW rank 6 bound to socket 0[core 2[hwt 0]], >>>> socket >>>>>> 0[core 3[hwt 0]]: [././B/B][./././.] >>>>>> [node05.cluster:20949] MCW rank 2 bound to socket 0[core 2[hwt 0]], >>>> socket >>>>>> 0[core 3[hwt 0]]: [././B/B][./././.] >>>>>> [node06.cluster:18491] MCW rank 7 bound to socket 1[core 6[hwt 0]], >>>> socket >>>>>> 1[core 7[hwt 0]]: [./././.][././B/B] >>>>>> [node05.cluster:20949] MCW rank 3 bound to socket 1[core 6[hwt 0]], >>>> socket >>>>>> 1[core 7[hwt 0]]: [./././.][././B/B] >>>>>> [node06.cluster:18491] MCW rank 4 bound to socket 0[core 0[hwt 0]], >>>> socket >>>>>> 0[core 1[hwt 0]]: [B/B/./.][./././.] >>>>>> [node05.cluster:20949] MCW rank 0 bound to socket 0[core 0[hwt 0]], >>>> socket >>>>>> 0[core 1[hwt 0]]: [B/B/./.][./././.] >>>>>> [node06.cluster:18491] MCW rank 5 bound to socket 1[core 4[hwt 0]], >>>> socket >>>>>> 1[core 5[hwt 0]]: [./././.][B/B/./.] >>>>>> [node05.cluster:20949] MCW rank 1 bound to socket 1[core 4[hwt 0]], >>>> socket >>>>>> 1[core 5[hwt 0]]: [./././.][B/B/./.] >>>>>> .... >>>>>> >>>>>> So, byobj_span would be okay. Of course, bynode and byslot should be >>>> okay. >>>>>> Could you take a look at orte_rmaps_rr_byobj again? >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Tetsuya Mishima >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> users mailing list >>>>>> us...@open-mpi.org >>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> users mailing list >>>>> us...@open-mpi.org >>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> users mailing list >>>> us...@open-mpi.org >>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> users mailing list >>> us...@open-mpi.org >>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users >> >> _______________________________________________ >> users mailing list >> us...@open-mpi.org >> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > us...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
