"restore" in what sense?

On Feb 27, 2014, at 4:10 PM, tmish...@jcity.maeda.co.jp wrote:

> 
> 
> Hi Ralph, this is just for your information.
> 
> I tried to restore previous orte_rmaps_rr_byobj. Then I gets the result
> below with this command line:
> 
> mpirun -np 8 -host node05,node06 -report-bindings -map-by socket:pe=2
> -display-map  -bind-to core:overload-allowed ~/mis/openmpi/demos/myprog
> Data for JOB [31184,1] offset 0
> 
> ========================   JOB MAP   ========================
> 
> Data for node: node05  Num slots: 1    Max slots: 0    Num procs: 7
>        Process OMPI jobid: [31184,1] App: 0 Process rank: 0
>        Process OMPI jobid: [31184,1] App: 0 Process rank: 2
>        Process OMPI jobid: [31184,1] App: 0 Process rank: 4
>        Process OMPI jobid: [31184,1] App: 0 Process rank: 6
>        Process OMPI jobid: [31184,1] App: 0 Process rank: 1
>        Process OMPI jobid: [31184,1] App: 0 Process rank: 3
>        Process OMPI jobid: [31184,1] App: 0 Process rank: 5
> 
> Data for node: node06  Num slots: 1    Max slots: 0    Num procs: 1
>        Process OMPI jobid: [31184,1] App: 0 Process rank: 7
> 
> =============================================================
> [node06.cluster:18857] MCW rank 7 bound to socket 0[core 0[hwt 0]], socket
> 0[core 1[hwt 0]]: [B/B/./.][./././.]
> [node05.cluster:21399] MCW rank 3 bound to socket 1[core 6[hwt 0]], socket
> 1[core 7[hwt 0]]: [./././.][././B/B]
> [node05.cluster:21399] MCW rank 4 bound to socket 0[core 0[hwt 0]], socket
> 0[core 1[hwt 0]]: [B/B/./.][./././.]
> [node05.cluster:21399] MCW rank 5 bound to socket 1[core 4[hwt 0]], socket
> 1[core 5[hwt 0]]: [./././.][B/B/./.]
> [node05.cluster:21399] MCW rank 6 bound to socket 0[core 2[hwt 0]], socket
> 0[core 3[hwt 0]]: [././B/B][./././.]
> [node05.cluster:21399] MCW rank 0 bound to socket 0[core 0[hwt 0]], socket
> 0[core 1[hwt 0]]: [B/B/./.][./././.]
> [node05.cluster:21399] MCW rank 1 bound to socket 1[core 4[hwt 0]], socket
> 1[core 5[hwt 0]]: [./././.][B/B/./.]
> [node05.cluster:21399] MCW rank 2 bound to socket 0[core 2[hwt 0]], socket
> 0[core 3[hwt 0]]: [././B/B][./././.]
> ....
> 
> 
> Then I add "-hostfile pbs_hosts" and the result is:
> 
> [mishima@manage work]$cat pbs_hosts
> node05 slots=8
> node06 slots=8
> [mishima@manage work]$ mpirun -np 8 -hostfile ~/work/pbs_hosts
> -report-bindings -map-by socket:pe=2 -display-map
> ~/mis/openmpi/demos/myprog
> Data for JOB [30254,1] offset 0
> 
> ========================   JOB MAP   ========================
> 
> Data for node: node05  Num slots: 8    Max slots: 0    Num procs: 4
>        Process OMPI jobid: [30254,1] App: 0 Process rank: 0
>        Process OMPI jobid: [30254,1] App: 0 Process rank: 2
>        Process OMPI jobid: [30254,1] App: 0 Process rank: 1
>        Process OMPI jobid: [30254,1] App: 0 Process rank: 3
> 
> Data for node: node06  Num slots: 8    Max slots: 0    Num procs: 4
>        Process OMPI jobid: [30254,1] App: 0 Process rank: 4
>        Process OMPI jobid: [30254,1] App: 0 Process rank: 6
>        Process OMPI jobid: [30254,1] App: 0 Process rank: 5
>        Process OMPI jobid: [30254,1] App: 0 Process rank: 7
> 
> =============================================================
> [node05.cluster:21501] MCW rank 2 bound to socket 0[core 2[hwt 0]], socket
> 0[core 3[hwt 0]]: [././B/B][./././.]
> [node05.cluster:21501] MCW rank 3 bound to socket 1[core 6[hwt 0]], socket
> 1[core 7[hwt 0]]: [./././.][././B/B]
> [node05.cluster:21501] MCW rank 0 bound to socket 0[core 0[hwt 0]], socket
> 0[core 1[hwt 0]]: [B/B/./.][./././.]
> [node05.cluster:21501] MCW rank 1 bound to socket 1[core 4[hwt 0]], socket
> 1[core 5[hwt 0]]: [./././.][B/B/./.]
> [node06.cluster:18935] MCW rank 6 bound to socket 0[core 2[hwt 0]], socket
> 0[core 3[hwt 0]]: [././B/B][./././.]
> [node06.cluster:18935] MCW rank 7 bound to socket 1[core 6[hwt 0]], socket
> 1[core 7[hwt 0]]: [./././.][././B/B]
> [node06.cluster:18935] MCW rank 4 bound to socket 0[core 0[hwt 0]], socket
> 0[core 1[hwt 0]]: [B/B/./.][./././.]
> [node06.cluster:18935] MCW rank 5 bound to socket 1[core 4[hwt 0]], socket
> 1[core 5[hwt 0]]: [./././.][B/B/./.]
> ....
> 
> 
> I think previous version's behavior would be close to what I expect.
> 
> Tetusya
> 
>> They have 4 cores/socket and 2 sockets, totally 4 X 2 = 8 cores, each.
>> 
>> Here is the output of lstopo.
>> 
>> mishima@manage round_robin]$ rsh node05
>> Last login: Tue Feb 18 15:10:15 from manage
>> [mishima@node05 ~]$ lstopo
>> Machine (32GB)
>> NUMANode L#0 (P#0 16GB) + Socket L#0 + L3 L#0 (6144KB)
>> L2 L#0 (512KB) + L1d L#0 (64KB) + L1i L#0 (64KB) + Core L#0 + PU L#0
>> (P#0)
>> L2 L#1 (512KB) + L1d L#1 (64KB) + L1i L#1 (64KB) + Core L#1 + PU L#1
>> (P#1)
>> L2 L#2 (512KB) + L1d L#2 (64KB) + L1i L#2 (64KB) + Core L#2 + PU L#2
>> (P#2)
>> L2 L#3 (512KB) + L1d L#3 (64KB) + L1i L#3 (64KB) + Core L#3 + PU L#3
>> (P#3)
>> NUMANode L#1 (P#1 16GB) + Socket L#1 + L3 L#1 (6144KB)
>> L2 L#4 (512KB) + L1d L#4 (64KB) + L1i L#4 (64KB) + Core L#4 + PU L#4
>> (P#4)
>> L2 L#5 (512KB) + L1d L#5 (64KB) + L1i L#5 (64KB) + Core L#5 + PU L#5
>> (P#5)
>> L2 L#6 (512KB) + L1d L#6 (64KB) + L1i L#6 (64KB) + Core L#6 + PU L#6
>> (P#6)
>> L2 L#7 (512KB) + L1d L#7 (64KB) + L1i L#7 (64KB) + Core L#7 + PU L#7
>> (P#7)
>> ....
>> 
>> I foucused on byobj_span and bynode. I didn't notice byobj was modified,
>> sorry.
>> 
>> Tetsuya
>> 
>>> Hmmm..what does your node look like again (sockets and cores)?
>>> 
>>> On Feb 27, 2014, at 3:19 PM, tmish...@jcity.maeda.co.jp wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Ralph, I'm afraid to say your new "map-by obj" causes another
>> problem.
>>>> 
>>>> I have overload message with this command line as shown below:
>>>> 
>>>> mpirun -np 8 -host node05,node06 -report-bindings -map-by socket:pe=2
>>>> -display-map ~/mis/openmpi/d
>>>> emos/myprog
>>>> 
>> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> A request was made to bind to that would result in binding more
>>>> processes than cpus on a resource:
>>>> 
>>>>  Bind to:         CORE
>>>>  Node:            node05
>>>>  #processes:  2
>>>>  #cpus:          1
>>>> 
>>>> You can override this protection by adding the "overload-allowed"
>>>> option to your binding directive.
>>>> 
>> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> 
>>>> Then, I add "-bind-to core:overload-allowed" to see what happenes.
>>>> 
>>>> mpirun -np 8 -host node05,node06 -report-bindings -map-by socket:pe=2
>>>> -display-map -bind-to core:o
>>>> verload-allowed ~/mis/openmpi/demos/myprog
>>>> Data for JOB [14398,1] offset 0
>>>> 
>>>> ========================   JOB MAP   ========================
>>>> 
>>>> Data for node: node05  Num slots: 1    Max slots: 0    Num procs: 4
>>>>       Process OMPI jobid: [14398,1] App: 0 Process rank: 0
>>>>       Process OMPI jobid: [14398,1] App: 0 Process rank: 1
>>>>       Process OMPI jobid: [14398,1] App: 0 Process rank: 2
>>>>       Process OMPI jobid: [14398,1] App: 0 Process rank: 3
>>>> 
>>>> Data for node: node06  Num slots: 1    Max slots: 0    Num procs: 4
>>>>       Process OMPI jobid: [14398,1] App: 0 Process rank: 4
>>>>       Process OMPI jobid: [14398,1] App: 0 Process rank: 5
>>>>       Process OMPI jobid: [14398,1] App: 0 Process rank: 6
>>>>       Process OMPI jobid: [14398,1] App: 0 Process rank: 7
>>>> 
>>>> =============================================================
>>>> [node06.cluster:18443] MCW rank 6 bound to socket 0[core 0[hwt 0]],
>> socket
>>>> 0[core 1[hwt 0]]: [B/B/./.][./././.]
>>>> [node05.cluster:20901] MCW rank 2 bound to socket 0[core 0[hwt 0]],
>> socket
>>>> 0[core 1[hwt 0]]: [B/B/./.][./././.]
>>>> [node06.cluster:18443] MCW rank 7 bound to socket 0[core 2[hwt 0]],
>> socket
>>>> 0[core 3[hwt 0]]: [././B/B][./././.]
>>>> [node05.cluster:20901] MCW rank 3 bound to socket 0[core 2[hwt 0]],
>> socket
>>>> 0[core 3[hwt 0]]: [././B/B][./././.]
>>>> [node06.cluster:18443] MCW rank 4 bound to socket 0[core 0[hwt 0]],
>> socket
>>>> 0[core 1[hwt 0]]: [B/B/./.][./././.]
>>>> [node05.cluster:20901] MCW rank 0 bound to socket 0[core 0[hwt 0]],
>> socket
>>>> 0[core 1[hwt 0]]: [B/B/./.][./././.]
>>>> [node06.cluster:18443] MCW rank 5 bound to socket 0[core 2[hwt 0]],
>> socket
>>>> 0[core 3[hwt 0]]: [././B/B][./././.]
>>>> [node05.cluster:20901] MCW rank 1 bound to socket 0[core 2[hwt 0]],
>> socket
>>>> 0[core 3[hwt 0]]: [././B/B][./././.]
>>>> Hello world from process 4 of 8
>>>> Hello world from process 2 of 8
>>>> Hello world from process 6 of 8
>>>> Hello world from process 0 of 8
>>>> Hello world from process 5 of 8
>>>> Hello world from process 1 of 8
>>>> Hello world from process 7 of 8
>>>> Hello world from process 3 of 8
>>>> 
>>>> When I add "map-by obj:span", it works fine:
>>>> 
>>>> mpirun -np 8 -host node05,node06 -report-bindings -map-by
>> socket:pe=2,span
>>>> -display-map  ~/mis/ope
>>>> nmpi/demos/myprog
>>>> Data for JOB [14703,1] offset 0
>>>> 
>>>> ========================   JOB MAP   ========================
>>>> 
>>>> Data for node: node05  Num slots: 1    Max slots: 0    Num procs: 4
>>>>       Process OMPI jobid: [14703,1] App: 0 Process rank: 0
>>>>       Process OMPI jobid: [14703,1] App: 0 Process rank: 2
>>>>       Process OMPI jobid: [14703,1] App: 0 Process rank: 1
>>>>       Process OMPI jobid: [14703,1] App: 0 Process rank: 3
>>>> 
>>>> Data for node: node06  Num slots: 1    Max slots: 0    Num procs: 4
>>>>       Process OMPI jobid: [14703,1] App: 0 Process rank: 4
>>>>       Process OMPI jobid: [14703,1] App: 0 Process rank: 6
>>>>       Process OMPI jobid: [14703,1] App: 0 Process rank: 5
>>>>       Process OMPI jobid: [14703,1] App: 0 Process rank: 7
>>>> 
>>>> =============================================================
>>>> [node06.cluster:18491] MCW rank 6 bound to socket 0[core 2[hwt 0]],
>> socket
>>>> 0[core 3[hwt 0]]: [././B/B][./././.]
>>>> [node05.cluster:20949] MCW rank 2 bound to socket 0[core 2[hwt 0]],
>> socket
>>>> 0[core 3[hwt 0]]: [././B/B][./././.]
>>>> [node06.cluster:18491] MCW rank 7 bound to socket 1[core 6[hwt 0]],
>> socket
>>>> 1[core 7[hwt 0]]: [./././.][././B/B]
>>>> [node05.cluster:20949] MCW rank 3 bound to socket 1[core 6[hwt 0]],
>> socket
>>>> 1[core 7[hwt 0]]: [./././.][././B/B]
>>>> [node06.cluster:18491] MCW rank 4 bound to socket 0[core 0[hwt 0]],
>> socket
>>>> 0[core 1[hwt 0]]: [B/B/./.][./././.]
>>>> [node05.cluster:20949] MCW rank 0 bound to socket 0[core 0[hwt 0]],
>> socket
>>>> 0[core 1[hwt 0]]: [B/B/./.][./././.]
>>>> [node06.cluster:18491] MCW rank 5 bound to socket 1[core 4[hwt 0]],
>> socket
>>>> 1[core 5[hwt 0]]: [./././.][B/B/./.]
>>>> [node05.cluster:20949] MCW rank 1 bound to socket 1[core 4[hwt 0]],
>> socket
>>>> 1[core 5[hwt 0]]: [./././.][B/B/./.]
>>>> ....
>>>> 
>>>> So, byobj_span would be okay. Of course, bynode and byslot should be
>> okay.
>>>> Could you take a look at orte_rmaps_rr_byobj again?
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Tetsuya Mishima
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> users mailing list
>>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> us...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> us...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users

Reply via email to