BTW, I looked up the -mca option: -mca |--mca <arg0> <arg1> Pass context-specific MCA parameters; they are considered global if --gmca is not used and only one context is specified (arg0 is the parameter name; arg1 is the parameter value)
Could you explain the args: btl and ^openib ? ---John On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 12:26 AM, John Chludzinski < john.chludzin...@gmail.com> wrote: > BINGO! That did it. Thanks. ---John > > > On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote: > >> No - the mca param has to be specified *before* your executable >> >> mpiexec -mca btl ^openib -n 4 ./a.out >> >> Also, note the space between "btl" and "^openib" >> >> >> On Sep 15, 2012, at 5:45 PM, John Chludzinski <john.chludzin...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Is this what you intended(?): >> >> *$ mpiexec -n 4 ./a.out -mca btl^openib >> >> *librdmacm: couldn't read ABI version. >> librdmacm: assuming: 4 >> CMA: unable to get RDMA device list >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> [[5991,1],0]: A high-performance Open MPI point-to-point messaging module >> was unable to find any relevant network interfaces: >> >> Module: OpenFabrics (openib) >> Host: elzbieta >> >> Another transport will be used instead, although this may result in >> lower performance. >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> librdmacm: couldn't read ABI version. >> librdmacm: assuming: 4 >> CMA: unable to get RDMA device list >> librdmacm: couldn't read ABI version. >> librdmacm: assuming: 4 >> CMA: unable to get RDMA device list >> librdmacm: couldn't read ABI version. >> librdmacm: assuming: 4 >> CMA: unable to get RDMA device list >> rank= 1 Results: 5.0000000 6.0000000 >> 7.0000000 8.0000000 >> rank= 0 Results: 1.0000000 2.0000000 >> 3.0000000 4.0000000 >> rank= 2 Results: 9.0000000 10.000000 >> 11.000000 12.000000 >> rank= 3 Results: 13.000000 14.000000 >> 15.000000 16.000000 >> [elzbieta:02374] 3 more processes have sent help message >> help-mpi-btl-base.txt / btl:no-nics >> [elzbieta:02374] Set MCA parameter "orte_base_help_aggregate" to 0 to see >> all help / error messages >> >> >> On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote: >> >>> Try adding "-mca btl ^openib" to your cmd line and see if that cleans it >>> up. >>> >>> >>> On Sep 15, 2012, at 12:44 PM, John Chludzinski < >>> john.chludzin...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> There was a bug in the code. So now I get this, which is correct but >>> how do I get rid of all these ABI, CMA, etc. messages? >>> >>> $ mpiexec -n 4 ./a.out >>> librdmacm: couldn't read ABI version. >>> librdmacm: couldn't read ABI version. >>> librdmacm: assuming: 4 >>> CMA: unable to get RDMA device list >>> librdmacm: assuming: 4 >>> CMA: unable to get RDMA device list >>> CMA: unable to get RDMA device list >>> librdmacm: couldn't read ABI version. >>> librdmacm: assuming: 4 >>> librdmacm: couldn't read ABI version. >>> librdmacm: assuming: 4 >>> CMA: unable to get RDMA device list >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> [[6110,1],1]: A high-performance Open MPI point-to-point messaging module >>> was unable to find any relevant network interfaces: >>> >>> Module: OpenFabrics (openib) >>> Host: elzbieta >>> >>> Another transport will be used instead, although this may result in >>> lower performance. >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> rank= 1 Results: 5.0000000 6.0000000 >>> 7.0000000 8.0000000 >>> rank= 2 Results: 9.0000000 10.000000 >>> 11.000000 12.000000 >>> rank= 0 Results: 1.0000000 2.0000000 >>> 3.0000000 4.0000000 >>> rank= 3 Results: 13.000000 14.000000 >>> 15.000000 16.000000 >>> [elzbieta:02559] 3 more processes have sent help message >>> help-mpi-btl-base.txt / btl:no-nics >>> [elzbieta:02559] Set MCA parameter "orte_base_help_aggregate" to 0 to >>> see all help / error messages >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 3:34 PM, John Chludzinski < >>> john.chludzin...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> BTW, here the example code: >>>> >>>> program scatter >>>> include 'mpif.h' >>>> >>>> integer, parameter :: SIZE=4 >>>> integer :: numtasks, rank, sendcount, recvcount, source, ierr >>>> real :: sendbuf(SIZE,SIZE), recvbuf(SIZE) >>>> >>>> ! Fortran stores this array in column major order, so the >>>> ! scatter will actually scatter columns, not rows. >>>> data sendbuf /1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, & >>>> 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, & >>>> 9.0, 10.0, 11.0, 12.0, & >>>> 13.0, 14.0, 15.0, 16.0 / >>>> >>>> call MPI_INIT(ierr) >>>> call MPI_COMM_RANK(MPI_COMM_WORLD, rank, ierr) >>>> call MPI_COMM_SIZE(MPI_COMM_WORLD, numtasks, ierr) >>>> >>>> if (numtasks .eq. SIZE) then >>>> source = 1 >>>> sendcount = SIZE >>>> recvcount = SIZE >>>> call MPI_SCATTER(sendbuf, sendcount, MPI_REAL, recvbuf, & >>>> recvcount, MPI_REAL, source, MPI_COMM_WORLD, ierr) >>>> print *, 'rank= ',rank,' Results: ',recvbuf >>>> else >>>> print *, 'Must specify',SIZE,' processors. Terminating.' >>>> endif >>>> >>>> call MPI_FINALIZE(ierr) >>>> >>>> end program >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 3:02 PM, John Chludzinski < >>>> john.chludzin...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> # export LD_LIBRARY_PATH >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> # mpiexec -n 1 printenv | grep PATH >>>>> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/openmpi/lib/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> PATH=/usr/lib/openmpi/bin/:/usr/lib/ccache:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/home/jski/.local/bin:/home/jski/bin >>>>> MODULEPATH=/usr/share/Modules/modulefiles:/etc/modulefiles >>>>> WINDOWPATH=1 >>>>> >>>>> # mpiexec -n 4 ./a.out >>>>> librdmacm: couldn't read ABI version. >>>>> librdmacm: assuming: 4 >>>>> CMA: unable to get RDMA device list >>>>> >>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> [[3598,1],0]: A high-performance Open MPI point-to-point messaging >>>>> module >>>>> was unable to find any relevant network interfaces: >>>>> >>>>> Module: OpenFabrics (openib) >>>>> Host: elzbieta >>>>> >>>>> Another transport will be used instead, although this may result in >>>>> lower performance. >>>>> >>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> librdmacm: couldn't read ABI version. >>>>> librdmacm: assuming: 4 >>>>> librdmacm: couldn't read ABI version. >>>>> CMA: unable to get RDMA device list >>>>> librdmacm: assuming: 4 >>>>> CMA: unable to get RDMA device list >>>>> librdmacm: couldn't read ABI version. >>>>> librdmacm: assuming: 4 >>>>> CMA: unable to get RDMA device list >>>>> [elzbieta:4145] *** An error occurred in MPI_Scatter >>>>> [elzbieta:4145] *** on communicator MPI_COMM_WORLD >>>>> [elzbieta:4145] *** MPI_ERR_TYPE: invalid datatype >>>>> [elzbieta:4145] *** MPI_ERRORS_ARE_FATAL: your MPI job will now abort >>>>> >>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> mpiexec has exited due to process rank 1 with PID 4145 on >>>>> node elzbieta exiting improperly. There are two reasons this could >>>>> occur: >>>>> >>>>> 1. this process did not call "init" before exiting, but others in >>>>> the job did. This can cause a job to hang indefinitely while it waits >>>>> for all processes to call "init". By rule, if one process calls "init", >>>>> then ALL processes must call "init" prior to termination. >>>>> >>>>> 2. this process called "init", but exited without calling "finalize". >>>>> By rule, all processes that call "init" MUST call "finalize" prior to >>>>> exiting or it will be considered an "abnormal termination" >>>>> >>>>> This may have caused other processes in the application to be >>>>> terminated by signals sent by mpiexec (as reported here). >>>>> >>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Ah - note that there is no LD_LIBRARY_PATH in the environment. That's >>>>>> the problem >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sep 15, 2012, at 11:19 AM, John Chludzinski < >>>>>> john.chludzin...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> $ which mpiexec >>>>>> /usr/lib/openmpi/bin/mpiexec >>>>>> >>>>>> # mpiexec -n 1 printenv | grep PATH >>>>>> >>>>>> PATH=/usr/lib/openmpi/bin/:/usr/lib/ccache:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/home/jski/.local/bin:/home/jski/bin >>>>>> MODULEPATH=/usr/share/Modules/modulefiles:/etc/modulefiles >>>>>> WINDOWPATH=1 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Couple of things worth checking: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1. verify that you executed the "mpiexec" you think you did - a >>>>>>> simple "which mpiexec" should suffice >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2. verify that your environment is correct by "mpiexec -n 1 printenv >>>>>>> | grep PATH". Sometimes the ld_library_path doesn't carry over like you >>>>>>> think it should >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sep 15, 2012, at 10:00 AM, John Chludzinski < >>>>>>> john.chludzin...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I installed OpenMPI (I have a simple dual core AMD notebook with >>>>>>> Fedora 16) via: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> # yum install openmpi >>>>>>> # yum install openmpi-devel >>>>>>> # mpirun --version >>>>>>> mpirun (Open MPI) 1.5.4 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I added: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> $ PATH=PATH=/usr/lib/openmpi/bin/:$PATH >>>>>>> $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/openmpi/lib/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Then: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> $ mpif90 ex1.f95 >>>>>>> $ mpiexec -n 4 ./a.out >>>>>>> ./a.out: error while loading shared libraries: libmpi_f90.so.1: >>>>>>> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory >>>>>>> ./a.out: error while loading shared libraries: libmpi_f90.so.1: >>>>>>> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory >>>>>>> ./a.out: error while loading shared libraries: libmpi_f90.so.1: >>>>>>> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory >>>>>>> ./a.out: error while loading shared libraries: libmpi_f90.so.1: >>>>>>> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> mpiexec noticed that the job aborted, but has no info as to the >>>>>>> process >>>>>>> that caused that situation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ls -l /usr/lib/openmpi/lib/ >>>>>>> total 6788 >>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 25 Sep 15 12:25 libmca_common_sm.so -> >>>>>>> libmca_common_sm.so.2.0.0 >>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 25 Sep 14 16:14 libmca_common_sm.so.2 >>>>>>> -> libmca_common_sm.so.2.0.0 >>>>>>> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 8492 Jan 20 2012 >>>>>>> libmca_common_sm.so.2.0.0 >>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 19 Sep 15 12:25 libmpi_cxx.so -> >>>>>>> libmpi_cxx.so.1.0.1 >>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 19 Sep 14 16:14 libmpi_cxx.so.1 -> >>>>>>> libmpi_cxx.so.1.0.1 >>>>>>> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 87604 Jan 20 2012 libmpi_cxx.so.1.0.1 >>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 19 Sep 15 12:25 libmpi_f77.so -> >>>>>>> libmpi_f77.so.1.0.2 >>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 19 Sep 14 16:14 libmpi_f77.so.1 -> >>>>>>> libmpi_f77.so.1.0.2 >>>>>>> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 179912 Jan 20 2012 libmpi_f77.so.1.0.2 >>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 19 Sep 15 12:25 libmpi_f90.so -> >>>>>>> libmpi_f90.so.1.1.0 >>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 19 Sep 14 16:14 libmpi_f90.so.1 -> >>>>>>> libmpi_f90.so.1.1.0 >>>>>>> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 10364 Jan 20 2012 libmpi_f90.so.1.1.0 >>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Sep 15 12:25 libmpi.so -> >>>>>>> libmpi.so.1.0.2 >>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Sep 14 16:14 libmpi.so.1 -> >>>>>>> libmpi.so.1.0.2 >>>>>>> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1383444 Jan 20 2012 libmpi.so.1.0.2 >>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 21 Sep 15 12:25 libompitrace.so -> >>>>>>> libompitrace.so.0.0.0 >>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 21 Sep 14 16:14 libompitrace.so.0 -> >>>>>>> libompitrace.so.0.0.0 >>>>>>> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 13572 Jan 20 2012 libompitrace.so.0.0.0 >>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 20 Sep 15 12:25 libopen-pal.so -> >>>>>>> libopen-pal.so.3.0.0 >>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 20 Sep 14 16:14 libopen-pal.so.3 -> >>>>>>> libopen-pal.so.3.0.0 >>>>>>> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 386324 Jan 20 2012 libopen-pal.so.3.0.0 >>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 20 Sep 15 12:25 libopen-rte.so -> >>>>>>> libopen-rte.so.3.0.0 >>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 20 Sep 14 16:14 libopen-rte.so.3 -> >>>>>>> libopen-rte.so.3.0.0 >>>>>>> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 790052 Jan 20 2012 libopen-rte.so.3.0.0 >>>>>>> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 301520 Jan 20 2012 libotf.a >>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Sep 15 12:25 libotf.so -> >>>>>>> libotf.so.0.0.1 >>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Sep 14 16:14 libotf.so.0 -> >>>>>>> libotf.so.0.0.1 >>>>>>> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 206384 Jan 20 2012 libotf.so.0.0.1 >>>>>>> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 337970 Jan 20 2012 libvt.a >>>>>>> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 591070 Jan 20 2012 libvt-hyb.a >>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 18 Sep 15 12:25 libvt-hyb.so -> >>>>>>> libvt-hyb.so.0.0.0 >>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 18 Sep 14 16:14 libvt-hyb.so.0 -> >>>>>>> libvt-hyb.so.0.0.0 >>>>>>> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 428844 Jan 20 2012 libvt-hyb.so.0.0.0 >>>>>>> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 541004 Jan 20 2012 libvt-mpi.a >>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 18 Sep 15 12:25 libvt-mpi.so -> >>>>>>> libvt-mpi.so.0.0.0 >>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 18 Sep 14 16:14 libvt-mpi.so.0 -> >>>>>>> libvt-mpi.so.0.0.0 >>>>>>> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 396352 Jan 20 2012 libvt-mpi.so.0.0.0 >>>>>>> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 372352 Jan 20 2012 libvt-mt.a >>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 17 Sep 15 12:25 libvt-mt.so -> >>>>>>> libvt-mt.so.0.0.0 >>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 17 Sep 14 16:14 libvt-mt.so.0 -> >>>>>>> libvt-mt.so.0.0.0 >>>>>>> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 266104 Jan 20 2012 libvt-mt.so.0.0.0 >>>>>>> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 60390 Jan 20 2012 libvt-pomp.a >>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 14 Sep 15 12:25 libvt.so -> >>>>>>> libvt.so.0.0.0 >>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 14 Sep 14 16:14 libvt.so.0 -> >>>>>>> libvt.so.0.0.0 >>>>>>> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 242604 Jan 20 2012 libvt.so.0.0.0 >>>>>>> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 303591 Jan 20 2012 mpi.mod >>>>>>> drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 Sep 14 16:14 openmpi >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The file (actually, a link) it claims it can't find: >>>>>>> libmpi_f90.so.1, is clearly there. And >>>>>>> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/openmpi/lib/. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What's the problem? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ---John >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> users mailing list >>>>>>> us...@open-mpi.org >>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> users mailing list >>>>>>> us...@open-mpi.org >>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> users mailing list >>>>>> us...@open-mpi.org >>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> users mailing list >>>>>> us...@open-mpi.org >>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> users mailing list >>> us...@open-mpi.org >>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> users mailing list >>> us...@open-mpi.org >>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> users mailing list >> us...@open-mpi.org >> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> users mailing list >> us...@open-mpi.org >> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users >> > >