Hi,

I applied the patch of ticket #3148 to my version of openmpi  1.6 and it does 
the job  .... at least for me.

Thanks'  for the prompt fix.

Yves Secretan
yves.secre...@ete.inrs.ca

Avant d'imprimer, pensez à l'environnement 


-----Message d'origine-----
De : users-boun...@open-mpi.org [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] De la part 
de Jeff Squyres
Envoyé : 2 juillet 2012 15:55
À : Open MPI Users
Objet : Re: [OMPI users] fortran program with integer kind=8 using openmpi

Huh.  That's weird.  I'll file a ticket.

FWIW, I think compiling OMPI with -i8 worked at one time, but it's probably 
little-used/little-tested.  It may have grown some bit-rot over time (like this 
case).



On Jun 30, 2012, at 12:34 PM, Secretan Yves wrote:

> Well,
> 
> With openmpi compiled with Fortran default integer*8, 
> MPI_TYPE_2INTEGER seem to have an incorrect size. The attached Fortran 
> program shows it,
> 
> When run on openmpi with integer*8
> Size of MPI_INTEGER is                     8
> Size of MPI_INTEGER4 is                     4
> Size of MPI_INTEGER8 is                     8
> Size of MPI_2INTEGER is                     8           <-- Should be 16
> 
> When run on "normal" openmpi 
> Size of MPI_INTEGER is            4
> Size of MPI_INTEGER4 is            4
> Size of MPI_INTEGER8 is            8
> Size of MPI_2INTEGER is            8
> 
> 
> Yves Secretan
> yves.secre...@ete.inrs.ca
> 
> Avant d'imprimer, pensez à l'environnement 
> ________________________________________
> De : users-boun...@open-mpi.org [users-boun...@open-mpi.org] de la 
> part de William Au [au_wai_ch...@hotmail.com] Date d'envoi : 29 juin 
> 2012 19:15 À : us...@open-mpi.org Objet : Re: [OMPI users] fortran 
> program with integer kind=8 using openmpi
> 
> My concern is how do the C side know fortran integer using 8 bytes?
> My valgrind check show something like:
> 
> ==8482== Invalid read of size 8
> ==8482==    at 0x5F4A50E: ompi_op_base_minloc_2integer 
> (op_base_functions.c:631)
> ==8482==    by 0xBF70DD1: ompi_coll_tuned_allreduce_intra_recursivedoubling 
> (op.h:498)
> ==8482==    by 0x5F031CB: PMPI_Allreduce (pallreduce.c:105)
> ==8482==    by 0x62E2F22: PMPI_ALLREDUCE (pallreduce_f.c:77)
> ==8482==    by 0x5C8934: mumps_276_ (mumps_part9.F:4667)
> ==8482==    by 0x54D89A: dmumps_ (dmumps_part1.F:157)
> ==8482==    by 0x43D358: dmumps_f77_ (dmumps_part3.F:6651)
> ==8482==    by 0x41420C: dmumps_c (mumps_c.c:422)
> ==8482==    by 0x412CB4: main (my_cExample_client.c:80)
> ==8482==  Address 0x7369608 is 0 bytes after a block of size 8 alloc'd
> ==8482==    at 0x4A0610C: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
> ==8482==    by 0xBF709B9: ompi_coll_tuned_allreduce_intra_recursivedoubling 
> (coll_tuned_allreduce.c:158)
> ==8482==    by 0x5F031CB: PMPI_Allreduce (pallreduce.c:105)
> ==8482==    by 0x62E2F22: PMPI_ALLREDUCE (pallreduce_f.c:77)
> ==8482==    by 0x5C8934: mumps_276_ (mumps_part9.F:4667)
> ==8482==    by 0x54D89A: dmumps_ (dmumps_part1.F:157)
> ==8482==    by 0x43D358: dmumps_f77_ (dmumps_part3.F:6651)
> ==8482==    by 0x41420C: dmumps_c (mumps_c.c:422)
> ==8482==    by 0x412CB4: main (my_cExample_client.c:80)
> 
> 
> The fortran side:
> 
>      INTEGER IN( 2 ), OUT( 2 )
> 
>      CALL MPI_ALLREDUCE( IN, OUT, 1, MPI_2INTEGER, MPI_MINLOC,
>     &                    COMM, IERR)
> 
> The compiler options will take care of IN be INTEGER*8, but will it do 
> the same for MPI_2INTEGER in the C side
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> William
> 
> 
> 
> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 07:03:18 -0400
> From: Jeff Squyres <jsquy...@cisco.com>
> Subject: Re: [OMPI users] fortran program with integer kind=8 using
>        openmpi
> To: <war...@atmos.washington.edu>, Open MPI Users <us...@open-mpi.org>
> Message-ID: <6ffea644-3f39-4b6e-add6-3721f4855...@cisco.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> 
> On Jun 28, 2012, at 8:37 PM, David Warren wrote:
> 
>> You should not have to recompile openmpi, but you do have to use the correct 
>> type. You can check the size of integers in your fortrana nd use 
>> MPI_INTEGER4 or MPI_INTEGER8 depending on what you get.
> 
> If you configure ompi with -fdefault-integer-8, then OMPI will assume that 
> Fortran integers are always 8 bytes, so be sure to also compile all of your 
> MPI applications the same way.  Indeed, you may want to configure OMPI with 
> something like:
> 
> ./configure FCFLAGS=-fdefault-integer-8 FFLAGS=-fdefault-integer-8 \
>   --with-wrapper-fflags=-fdefault-integer-8 \
>   --with-wrapper-fcflags=-fdefault-integer-8
> 
> This will add -fdefault-integer-8 to the mpif77 and mpif90 command lines 
> automatically so that you *can't* compile without that flag.
> 
> Be aware that 8-byte Fortran integers *should work* in Open MPI, but it is 
> probably not well tested.  You may well run into some issues; be sure to let 
> us know if you run into bugs.  Sending small test programs that show the 
> problem are usually the best way to help us identify/fix the precise problem.
> 
>> in gfortran use
>> integer i
>> if(sizeof(i) .eq. 8) then
>>    mpi_int_type=MPI_INTEGER8
>> else
>>    mpi_int_type=MPI_INTEGER4
>> endif
> 
> I don't think that this should be necessary -- as long as you configured OMPI 
> with the 8-byte-integer setting, then MPI_INTEGER should represent an 8 byte 
> integer.
> 
> --
> Jeff Squyres
> jsquy...@cisco.com
> For corporate legal information go to: 
> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
> 
> 
> <type_size.for>_______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> us...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users


--
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: 
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/


_______________________________________________
users mailing list
us...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users

Reply via email to