Am 05.04.2012 um 18:58 schrieb Eloi Gaudry: > -----Original Message----- > From: users-boun...@open-mpi.org [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On > Behalf Of Reuti > Sent: jeudi 5 avril 2012 18:41 > To: Open MPI Users > Subject: Re: [OMPI users] sge tight intregration leads to bad allocation > > Am 05.04.2012 um 17:55 schrieb Eloi Gaudry: > >> >>>> Here are the allocation info retrieved from `qstat -g t` for the related >>>> job: >>> >>> For me the output of `qstat -g t` shows MASTER and SLAVE entries but no >>> variables. Is there any wrapper defined for `qstat` to reformat the output >>> (or a ~/.sge_qstat defined)? >>> >>> [eg: ] sorry, i forgot about sge_qstat being defined. As I don't have any >>> slot available right now, I cannot relaunch the job to get the output >>> updated. >> Reuti, here is the output you asked two days ago. >> It was produced with another "bad" run for which 3 processes are running on >> nodes charlie and carl... but we should have only 2 processes on carl and 4 >> on charlie... > > This is indeed strange, as it first detects the correct allocation. And it > conforms to the one granted. > > - You used a plain `mpiexec` without and number of processes or machinesfile? > [eg: ] I'm using orterun and i'm ony providing the number of process. > Shouldn't I ?
With a tight integration it should work without specifying the number of ranks. But OTOH it shouldn't hurt if it's given. -- Reuti > - Can you please post while it's running the relevant lines from: > ps -e f --cols=500 > (f w/o -) from both machines. > It's allocated between the nodes more like in a round-robin fashion. > [eg: ] I'll try to do this tomorrow, as soon as some slots become free. > Thanks for your feedback Reuti, I appreciate. > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > us...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
