>No, I refer to your 3rd message in this thread, where you wrote:

OK you wont know what happened when I installed the new dconf-Editor....
This is the complete output that I got then ....:

------------------------------
[angelo_dev@zorro Downloads]$ sudo yum install
dconf-editor-0.15.0-4mgc30.x86_64.rpm
[sudo] password for angelo_dev:
Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit
Examining dconf-editor-0.15.0-4mgc30.x86_64.rpm:
dconf-editor-0.15.0-4mgc30.x86_64
Marking dconf-editor-0.15.0-4mgc30.x86_64.rpm to be installed
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package dconf-editor.x86_64 0:0.15.0-4mgc30 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: dconf = 0.15.0-4mgc30 for package:
dconf-editor-0.15.0-4mgc30.x86_64
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: dconf-editor-0.15.0-4mgc30.x86_64
(/dconf-editor-0.15.0-4mgc30.x86_64)
           Requires: dconf = 0.15.0-4mgc30
           Installed: dconf-0.18.0-2.fc20.x86_64
(@koji-override-0/$releasever)
               dconf = 0.18.0-2.fc20
 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
 You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest

------------------------------

End.. if I still try  to install  dconf-editor-0.15.0-4mgc30.x86_64.rpm
I (always) continue to have  this output..


I continue to try the solution of this problem in the way you suggest me..

Thank you

Regards

Angelo


On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Michael Schwendt <mschwe...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 10:23:03 +0300, Angelo Moreschini wrote:
>
> >  I installed fedora 20 not long ago, and now I'm customizing the
> > installation by adding programs not included by default in the
> installation.
>
> Just don't download programs from arbitrary web sites. Prefer sticking
> to official package repositories and well-known 3rd party add-on
> repositories.
>
> > ....at the same time that I installed dconf-editor, I also installed
> "Tweak
> > Tool" and "menulibre"; this fact can be relevant?
>
> Well, if you really want to attempt at doing some trouble-shooting, start
> with basic steps such as trying to reproduce the problem with a fresh user
> account, without becoming superuser, with something else than GNOME Shell
> (e.g. a simple window manager such as Openbox - it is fairly convenient to
> install that from Fedora's repos and log in into it, too).
>
> >  > Where is the error you've mentioned in the previous mail?
> >
> >  I'll explain what I can think about can be problematic:
>
> No, I refer to your 3rd message in this thread, where you wrote:
>
> | [...] have now on my computer some old API(s) that don't
> | allow me to install the new package.
> | The output of the program that failed the new installation suggest me:
> |  You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
> |  You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
>
> There, the details (the full output prior to that error message) has
> not been shown. Later you could not show it anymore because you didn't
> get any errors.
>
> That's what I'm referring to. If a problem is not reproducible anymore,
> it cannot be examined at all anymore.
>
> >  In the meantime, however, I continued to do tries and I found that the
> > application could be affected by bugs:
> >
> >  *Bug 975521* <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975521> -
> unable
> > to change settings using dconf
>
> Have you actually read through the comments of that ticket?
>
> > *Bug 956306* <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956306> -
> gnome
> > shell freezes when window is present from su session
>
> Have you done anything to confirm that theory?
> Does the program work if you run it as a normal user instead of via "su"?
>
> >  What I can check still on the computer to understand the problem?
>
> Focus on a specific problem, try to trouble-shoot it as long as it is
> reproducible. Gather details, find out whether somebody can reproduce it
> and confirm it. Search in bugzilla, file a bug report. Don't mess with
> your computer too much. Fedora 20 is not free of bugs. It may even be that
> it is not reproducible with Fedora 21 (at least, here it isn't
> reproducible).
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
>
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to