On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Mike Wright wrote:
I've been holding my nose and keeping my mouth shut for the last couple of
years but I have to concur. Time was, a signature with `uptime` showing
many hundreds of days, if not multiple years, was a badge of honor. Now
people cavalierly toss out, "... and reboot".
I've been expecting that fedora 95 release notes will peacock the addition of
a start button and a BSOD as a feature. (place whichever emoticon applies,
here)
fedora is dead. Long live fedora.
MWright
I don't think it's a fedora thing. I think it's a linux thing.
And I'm not saying that it's all bad -- open source systems go the way
developers want it to go, and we user types are pretty much along for the ride.
We can get off any time we want, no harm no foul, and for me the ride is still
a lot of fun.
It may be that something forks into new and innovative territory. Maybe it
just becomes an open source Windows platform -- which would still be better
than Windows itself. For me it's a win whichever way it goes; I'm not
Windows-phobic, except for privacy and security issues.
So, when I say that about systemd, it's not necessarily a criticism. It's just
an example of the changing philosophy that's moving linux one more step into
the Windows-like neighborhood. That may be a smart move, but as with all
things in life, every decision has a cost and a benefit.
billo
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
