On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 20:30:17 +0200 Anders Wegge Keller <we...@wegge.dk> wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 19:08:14 +0300 > Joonas Sarajärvi <m...@iki.fi> wrote: > > > 2014-09-12 11:06 GMT+03:00 Anders Wegge Keller <we...@wegge.dk>: > > > Do you know of a place where I can find the analysis behind this > > > assessment, or is it just your personal opinion? > > > > The recent initsystem debate [1] from Debian pretty exhaustively > > explores the pros and cons of many major init system options. While > > the needs of Fedora differ slightly, a lot of the discussion applies > > here, too. > > I'm asking for a pointer to the numerous rebuttals of falsehoods, and > carefully considerations, that time and time again are claimed to > exist. A Debian document, written to whitewash a forced descision is > not what I'm asking for. Note that the document was composed by the entire debian tech comittee, even those that voted against systemd, but ok. > I wan't to know where that documentation Kevin Fenzi likes to trot > about actually is to be found. Where did I 'trot about' documentation? I'd start with: http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/the-biggest-myths.html kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
