On Aug 28, 2014, at 12:21 PM, Bruno Wolff III <br...@wolff.to> wrote:
> 
> I think using raid 1 (with the 1.0 header format) can work well for that. 
> There can still grub issues with having a boot just work, but at least you 
> have the stuff you need available.

GRUB2 can locate vmlinuz/initramfs on md/mdadm raid0,1,10,5,6, even degraded. 
There is a BIOS specific limitation recognizing a certain number of drives. So 
you kinda have to watch out for that.

A possible problem with metadata format 0.9 (deprecated) and 1.0 is that the 
metadata is at the end of the partition; so in raid1 configurations, one of the 
partitions can be mounted normally as if there's no raid. The problem comes 
when modifying the volume, the raid metadata isn't updated. So when the raid is 
later assembled, md has no idea that one of the raid members is different than 
the other. This can quickly cause one or both members to become corrupted. So 
it's generally better (and recommended) to use metadata 1.2 format, which 
offsets the file system just beyond 4K from the start of the partition. That 
way a single raid member isn't mountable on its own, you have to first assemble 
the raid, then mount the file system.



Chris Murphy
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to