On 3 April 2014 14:16, Rahul Sundaram <methe...@gmail.com> wrote: > HI > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:44 AM, Ian Malone wrote: >> >> >> So no-one is allowed to ask questions on hear and have them answered >> by anybody who knows what they're talking about? > > > You seemed to have missed the point. I will state it more directly. You > are unwilling to spend your free time on learning about new projects which > is fine yet you are curious about them and others who would equally value > their free time are spending some of it answering your questions. I am > pointing out that, it doesn't hurt to acknowledge the other side of it and > appreciate that. >
Others are coming up with conjectures and presenting them as fact to back up a particular position (the one that it's the responsibility of projects to chase the latest and greatest infrastructure change). I started by saying that it is not great for yet another infrastructure replacement to ignore what's gone on before and expect other projects to change if they are not going to gain functionality. I stand by that. I've now looked into what Xwayland is doing (what little information is available) and if it lives up to its claims it should have little performance hit and I think a WM should be able to run on it, certainly the type of lightweight one that doesn't have much to gain by writing Wayland support. Which means I think the Wayland project is taking a responsible approach. -- imalone http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
