On 01.12.2013 19:48, Beartooth wrote: > On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 06:08:08 +0100, poma wrote: > >> On 25.11.2013 21:50, Beartooth wrote: >>> >>> In the past, I have always set my default browser to Dillo, which >>> is very fast and very safe; and it usually shows me at least enough to >>> guess reasonably well whether I want to go on, switch to another >>> browser, >>> or skip the site. >> >> Web browser with rudimentary https/ssl support you are considering safe >> [1]. Really? > > Yes. That has been part of its purpose for well over ten years, > if not since inception. It does not accept cookies, nor keep a history > file, for instance. It aims to be as nearly minimal as it can, short of > being text-only. The idea, as with the early routers, is to have nothing > there for a cracker to get hold of.
You've just confirmed that you do not know what you're talking about. >> You too really don't have idea what you're talking about. >> Don't you? > > Is it my imagination, or has the use of common courtesy dropped > several levels lately? As shown before, and now also you're unable to show appreciation to people who help you. Bee awesome.:! poma -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
